A footprint of a shoe on the Moon!

In this picture we can see a footprint. But it is not a footprint of the astronauts. It is different. Like a print of a shoe!

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• moon
• landing
• hoax
• fake
• shoe
• footprint

[berny88925]

its perfectly real, both. They were in the moon. Explanation for the shoe. Chuck Norris

[Spindry96]

I bet this shoe pattern wasn't even invented at the time of the Apollo missions.

[16nowhereman]

Well, it's a giant foot print!

[RAREpicture]

it's a drag

[YDDES]

@thecubanism OK. Just forget that I tried to communicate with You.

[thecubanism]

And, the same old question, when Roger Bannister broke the four minute mile, John Landy did it and he was followed by lots of others but the moon landings, oh no, not Russia, years in front in space exploration, not Japan with the money, the resources, the desire, [and Americas ally], and they didn't even provide us with the once and for all end to the debate pictures of the lander base, the moon buggy, the discarded detrius, in fact nothing, fuck all, sorry boys, you will have to do better.

[thecubanism]

YDDES, regolith grains, how the hell do you know what regolith grains are, did you somehow sneak on and sneak off again on landing? you are spouting parrot fashion what NASA want you to spout, think for yourself for once my friend, look at Gene Cerman's interview, look at Aldrin, Shephard and Collins [I don't recall seeing any stars] he was orbitting, and he didn't see any stars!!!!, was he also affected by the moon's surface glare?

,

u

[YDDES]

@mikesomething OK, I see. You just want to look stupid.

[mikesomething]

@YDDES lmao you think people cant fly planes today lol

i went on a plane last year u fucking retard

[YDDES]

@mikesomething We can't fly the Concorde (or other supersonic transports) over the Atlantic today. Does that mean that all who say they have flown in Concorde in the 70's lie?

USAF can't fly the SR-71 (the fastest jet ever), today. Does that mean it didn't fly in the 60's, 70's, 80's and 90's?

Please get some technological education.

[YDDES]

@thecubanism The "problem" is that You walked in an environment with atmospere, in sand affected by wid and water during millions of years, while the astronauts walked in vacuum, in lunar regolith, which has not been affected by wind or water. That makes a big difference, since the regolith grains are much sharper and stick to each other in a whole different way than the earthly sand.

[thecubanism]

How the hell can there be footprints in dry sand? I recently walked across Southport sandhills after a shower of rain and still couldn't produce a footprint, what am I doing wrong?