40 Kent Hovind Lies Part 1 - HD and new audio

This is an HD version of a previous video, with better audio. Coonkiller92 wanted to know if anyone could find 25 lies told by Kent Hovind. I did a cursory review of the material I had and found 40. Here they are.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• kent
• hovind
• evolution
• creation
• lies
• coonkiller92

[davidthmovies]

There's only 40???

[shanedk]

@davidthmovies No, I just stopped at 40.

[xhemexx]

I wish Hovind would shut up and focus of the spiritual side of faith, because his so called false science garbage in believe the earth is only 6000 years is an embarressment to us other Christians. I as a Christian would feel like telling that idiot to stop because I can't stand him.He and others that think the world is 6000 years old bring Christianity a bad name. Focus on the spiritual part of Christianity and Jesus as opposed to your bullshit science attempt.

[micometer]

@rkyeun Oh, another mistake on my part; you were saying that "time started with time started." Sheesh, I am not comprehending tonight. I think I'll go back to the rocks where I'm actually informed. *walks off dejected before laughing heartily*

[rkyeun]

@micometer

No problem. :)

You said you had a bit of trouble understanding it, so I thought I'd rephrase it a few different ways and offer some explanation.

[micometer]

@rkyeun Lol, yes, I said the same thing in the last two sentences. I didn't say "time started with time already started" however, that would have been redundantly redundant.

This is definitely a subject which I have no formal training in though the concept of a white hole is intriguing.

Thanks for the chat at any rate.

[rkyeun]

There are two kinds of known singularity, and at each causality bites it in a different way. At short distance from a black hole, the distortion of space and time forms an event horizon, an end to the universe. At the event horizon, causes vanish into the singularity and have no further effects. The other end is a white hole, and rather than an event horizon it has a big bang, from which effects emerge with no prior cause.

Time started with time already started. Hm, is that tautology?

[micometer]

@rkyeun I didn't watch the vids but I did find the full transcript of the talk (much quicker to read).

I see how Hawking puts the idea forth but I still am having a hard time getting my head around it. Even as an Earth Scientist I find this beyond me; I'd have to do more digging to further my understanding.

However, from what I did understand your point is correct. There is a relative "start" of time-space and I concede the point.

[micometer]

@rkyeun Link that sauce, please. I am interested.

Last I knew we can only determine up to a fraction (of a fraction) of a second after the big bang. Even then it does indicate that all matter, energy, time, space expanded from the single point. In that way, yeah I agree that everything started then. However there is no real way to do anything other than speculate pre-big bang. While I dont argue for causality (as pre-big bang may have always existed) its possible to say time not matter started.

[rkyeun]

@micometer

Stephen Hawking disagrees with you.