The Soviet Union wasn't "against Nazis" though this propaganda is very popular and still defended by phony and weak postwar Neo-Marxists. But the same people hate National Bolshevism, too. Surprise, surprise.
History is written by the victors. And the proud victors are undoubtedly Capitalists. They control the world since the beginning of the postwar era. It is, therefore, important for us to get an OWN idea of history and especially the history of Leftism. Is Leftism really anti-nationalistic and multicultural on a global basis? Is Leftism really for a borderless world like Capitalism? Is Leftism really based on "love", multiculturalism and "stop the hate" rhetoric?
National Bolshevism is a combination of the two revolutionary concepts of Nationalism and Socialism, which represent the anti-capitalist aspects of the doctrine. National Bolshevism is Socialism (the supplantation of Capitalism) applied to the further economic and social development of the people. This is the only logical method of securing the survival and prosperity of the people and Nation as a whole, since all other political-economic systems only lead to the dominance of a selfish oligarchy over the interests of the people.
One must not disregard the "Socialism" of National Bolshevism, in fact that is just as important as its "Nationalism" (its country, culture and genetics), for without first and foremost an orderly and rational political-economic base the people will eventually be exploited and come to ruin. If the State is not governed by leaders inspired with socialist ideals, then it will be ruled by human scum who's indifferent to the welfare of the people or national community.
Nationalism is no proof of anti-Socialism (Rightism), nor is racialism. At least initially, racialism and nationalism seem essentially undistinguishable so does racialism or Nationalism make a National Bolshevist non-socialist? Hardly. The post-war exodus of Jews from the Soviet Union and the tales of persecution that they brought with them are surely proof enough of that. Or was the Soviet Union rightist? And it is also clear that anti-Semitism was not a defining feature of Mussolini's Fascism. It was more a defining feature of Northern European culture AND of LEFTISM. Both Mussolini in Italy and Mosley in Britain were fascist leaders but neither was initially anti-semitic or racialist. Hitler also rejected the leninist and trotskyite claim that "the NSDAP is capitalist" and always stated it is anti-capitalist. He put "nature" (environmentalism) at the centre of his thinking.
He was against "multinational banks and companies" (globalization). And he regarded the German social system (welfare state) as an outstanding achievement. And while Hitler did not nationalize all industry, there was extensive compulsory reorganization of it and tight party control over it. Clearly, the NSDAP, Horst Wessel, Gregor Strasser, Ernst Roehm, Joseph Goebbels etc. did indeed reflect all of Socialism's themes and clearly were of the Left. Hitler was a Leftist by the standards of his day, as his championship of eugenics showed. Nazi propagandists insisted again and again that Marxism is the quintessence of the "Jewish mind", and that it is the great historic mission of National Socialism to root it out. It's true that this attitude didn't prevent Hitler either from cooperating with the German Communists in undermining the Weimar Republic, or from training his black guards in Russian artillery and aviation camps in the years 1923 - 1933, or -- in the period from August 1939 until June 1941 -- from entering into a close political and military complicity with Soviet Russia.
Nevertheless, public opinion supports the view that Nazism and Bolshevism are philosophies implacably opposed to each other. In reality, Bolshevism and National Socialism are two forms of extreme Socialism / Leftism.
Hegel's basic idea, the idea that absolutely GRABBED Marx, Engels, the Nazis and other Socialists, was that history is ORDERLY -- rather than just repeating itself, it is actually a progression towards an endpoint of perfection. And that perfect end is freedom, but not freedom as we would know it: THE STATE is the essential reality and embodies all of human progress.
The contempt that German Hitlerites had for "Bolshevism" or "marxist Jews" generally should also not mislead us in assessing the similarity between National Socialism and Communism. Leftist sects are very prone to rivalry, dissension, schism and hatred of one-another. One has only to think of the Bolsheviks versus the Mensheviks, Stalin versus Trotsky, China versus the Soviet Union etc. Similarity does not preclude rivalry. Hitler and Stalin were literally brothers in arms BEFORE they became rivals. That socialist brothers sometimes fall out should not prevent us from noting the brotherhood concerned.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/hitler.html
Loading...
10:52
Hitler was a "NazBol" (Nationalist and Socialist)by DieGermanoLinke5,813 views
oh, How do you explain Hitler's alliance with Rightwing Franco, Horthy, Petain, Goering etc.
MrReco12 2 months ago
@MrReco12
How do you explain America's support of Stalin?
NVAGestasipo 2 months ago
Hitler was a right winger, he was a church boy, he killed thousands of German communists and murdered millions of soviets in death camps and mid war executions. You clearly know nothing about the difference between National Socialism and Communist Socialism.
The pictures you show don't mean anything. Why? because your dates PROVE that they had a peace treaty and nothing more. It's like a picture of a cat, and saying the cat is hunting a mouse. You don't know that, it's just a picture of a cat.
helix4811 3 months ago
@helix4811
Don't try to sound "intelligent" because we know you're not.
NVAGestasipo 2 months ago