Archaeology vs the Bible (James Randi)
Top Comments
All Comments (490)
-
@Jesusisthetruth1000 If you're asking would I believe in god if cooperation were observed only in humans to the exclusion of other animals -- no. That would not serve as evidence of god, certainly not a water-walking zombie god.
Now if you wouldn't mind answering the question I already asked: Since cooperation and concern for others is observed in other animal species besides humans, do you think god planted something in their "hearts" as well?
-
And you still have not proven how life started or how universe started!
And the only proof you would accept for god would be if zebras give birth to a lion!?
-
@SadeofDarkness I agree with everything you said. But none of it has anything to do with evolution.
-
You do not get my point!
I never said evolution is false therefore the resurrection is true (or proven)!!!
I say evolution is false therefore there must be a god!
And even if it would be true , than it still could be a giuded process!
I have no desperation!
Can you prove to me positve mutations with more information in it?
And i gave you a link that the chinese people had knowledge from genesis!
-
-
You have not expressed that you believe in macroevoution without any designer?
You do not think before you post Einstein?
The dogmatic no designer voodoo science is not biased?
-
@Jesusisthetruth1000 I'm more than happy to continue addressing your misunderstanding of evolution, but I'm not sure why it's relevant. You're simply deflecting the absurdity of your belief in a zombie god by going after evolution.
Neither I nor anyone else said "Evolution is true, therefore the resurrection is false". However, what you in desperation are trying to argue is "Evolution is false, therefore the resurrection is true".
-
@Jesusisthetruth1000 You seem not to realize the circularity of your argument: You tried to use the mention of the Golden Rule in the bible as proof for your particular god. When I indicated examples of the Golden Rule outside the bible (and older than the bible), you claimed that your god (which you still haven't proven) is responsible for those as well.
-
@RhondaH Yeah, I never claimed the bible was real. Regardless, nowhere does it say he was born in nazareth.
-
@yourliver1 You'd be more convincing if you knew that the gospels refer to him as Jesus of Nazareth throughout as his "home town" where he was raised. Of course it is all completely fictional anyway. Proof? Mark 14:35-40 The author writes dialog that only a fiction writer would write - the thoughts and words of his character that none of the other characters can know or hear.
@Jesusisthetruth1000
And again, you're dodging my point. Even if evolution was proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to be false, how would that prove your religion out of the myriad hundreds in the world? Why would it not prove the Greeks were right? And again, you've provided no proof for Jesus being magical while rejecting all the archaeological evidence for evolution. Equal proof, please.
tipoomaster 2 days ago 4
@Jesusisthetruth1000
So what you're saying is that you can't prove Jesus was a magicy man, yet you laugh in the face of the volumes of proof for evolution. Nothing I can do once the cognitive barriers are so high. And the scientific world isn't necessarily the Atheistic world, lots of reasonable Christians accept evolution and science as valid.
tipoomaster 3 days ago 3