One Nation Under Lee - Part 5
Top Comments
All Comments (23)
-
dearest singaporeans, have confidence in your heart to fight FOR YOUR VOICES, FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND JUSTICE IN SINGAPORE. we should abolish this one party, PAP once and for all. we have to have faith in the current opposition parties, and listen, listen very carefully to what they are saying and fighting for singapore..... they're witnessing so much injustice and internal crimes stealthilty done in the PAP government. USE YOUR VOICE AND STAND TOGETHER AND FACE THESE PHONY PAP.
-
soon it will fall. soon.
-
i think these people are not asking for too much. they're asking for what's right under the constitution.
so you're saying it's totally fine to pay our ministers millions?
*claps*
-
Mubarak's regime last over thirty years, but PAP one last over fifty years and still counting.
-
@sinigang2006 Yes, but no dynasty is forever. By silencing oppressions, they are delaying what is due to come. This would cause an outbreak of violence or force to remove them, as it seems to be the only way to change things.
-
vote the pap out !
-
amiiin
-
End the one familee rule in Singapore.
-
singaporean must destroy this pap tyrant like mubarak,gadaffi and other tyrant
-
before going forward, stop and think of the present - what ought to be done and ought to be reformed. you can't just move forward blindly and succumb in this autocratic atlantis.
This video have the point in some ways, but as a Singaporean you must think the long term issues ... too much freedom and democracy can destabilized this very small country which has not enough resources to support the people. One serious single mistake can lead to revolutions, civil wars, economic downturn, 3rd world status, security issues, and chaos. We build Singapore from scratch to become like this right now ... and I am proud to be a Singaporean. Go forward Singapore!!
sinigang2006 2 years ago 7
So juicypencil...Singapore is now a Chinese society? Last I checked, it is a meritocratic, multi-racial society, with equality for ALL. Perhaps you should rethink your statements
thomassj 2 years ago 5