Science Refutes Its Own Laws?

Some scientists would like us to believe that the universe created itself from nothing and randomly formed into an orderly system with evidence of planned creations everywhere. However, this idea refutes two of the most important laws to which those same scientists claim they adhere.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• religion
• church
• creation
• evolution
• adam
• eve
• genesis
• big bang
• universe

[chanjl41]

Apparently you're not updated with the latest Science, let me spell it out. Instead of the conservation of energy, there is now a conservation of mass-energy. At the start the whole universe was basically energy. However as energy spread out in the big bang, it slowly became mass.

Second, thermodynamics does not account for intermolecular forces, which make up a sizeable influence in the universe. (Thermodynamics is all about kinetic energy in case you have never been in a Physics class)

[atparks13]

So the science has changed yet again? There's a shocker.

[jiji45]

The bible which is the Word of God says, that a day is like a thousand years for God and a thousand years is like a day for God. This is how awesome our God is.

[atparks13]

Wrong. You need to study Hebrew a tad more

[pursuitfortruth]

so... where did the big bang come from

[000majorwinters000]

Right! Science changes! Because science is theory too. Just like how some people like to randomly relate happenings on this earth with those in the bible to prove its' existence. By the way, our system isn't totally "orderly" if you look a bit closer. Our sun is going to die out at some point in time, and it will change back to "disorder".

[chanjl41]

Nah, these have been there for like a quater of the history of Science, and for all history of Modern Science, (that's about 100 years) ever since Einstein discovered relativity.

And a changing Science allows to get closer to understanding the universe.

[spdjeanne]

Atheists have very good reason to be moral without the accountability of God. Consider that the point of Christianity is to have life and health in this world and the next via salvation through Jesus. Morals for an Atheist are those rules that we agree upon that have worked to bring us more life and health in this life. Since Atheists don't believe in any afterlife there is no need for them to consider Morality in terms of an afterlife.

[TheFallibleFiend]

Your understanding of the second law is wrong. It doesn't say that at all. You're good at making videos, but you don't take the time to check your "facts."

[brtkrbzhnv]

If you weren't bearing false witness you'd give examples. Remember that I said "contemporary".

[Melfox]

Yes there is. Other than the Bible, there are many other accounts of a man by the name of Jesus hanging from the cross with two other men, both criminals, and being executed in the center for being the 'worst' of them. So yes, there are many other accounts of Jesus other than the Bible, which has also been proven to be true.