P.G. Ep 7 (Standinstann gets Expelled on ID)

standinstann's video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gaInFJsXeI

Intelligent Design is nothing like what you make it out to be.

Don't take this the wrong way, Standinstann, I'm not attacking you personally in this video at all.

I am merely pointing out that once we establish that you don't have any idea what you are talking about, your demeanor and content shows you to be a pseudointellectual.

The Urban Dictionary has a great definition...
Pseudointellectual:
"A pseudointellectual is someone who spews great amounts of garbage, interlaces it with huge words, and then expects to be accepted by the generally weak-minded sheep as a true intellectual. they are to be pitied and shown no leniency whenever you tromp on them with an actual argument."



All material is created by me, with the exception of the background, which is public domain. Here's the link to the public domain photo:
http://www.4freephotos.com/Water_drops_on_window-image-3e88c76051120f3c2bb90d...

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• standinstann
• npage85
• intelligent
• design
• ID
• evolution
• bill
• maher
• Religulous
• atheism
• christianity
• dawkins
• Harris
• God.

[SaucisseMerguez]

laughable, you smartasses all think your pretty smart but your not, none of you, not just because your arguments are just stupid and boring anyway, it sounds like your all reading fucking books, none of you know the meaning of the word "spontaneous". stupid drones act smart when they just gobble up books and spew them out with your dumb acronyms. again your laughable.

[RationalFox]

That's very poor logic, actually. You're saying "everything designed has CSI so everything with CSI is designed." It would be like saying "everything we know of has a material cause so life must also have a material cause."

[255ad]

the universal improbability bound only matters if you assume this is the only universe that exists witch physics shows it probably isn't

[ukchristian28]

I am not sure I agree with ID, but this is a good response to Stann.

[123columbo123]

the guy got fired not because of what was in the paper it was because he ignored the peer review process and then lied

[irish655]

this is complete babble. It was proved in the Dover vs Kitzmiller case of 2007 that ID was EXACTLY a word processing substitution for creation. ID is NOT scientific in any way. NO real scientists entertain it as a possibility. It is thinly disguised religion. plain and simple, end of discussion

[gigerone]

But it is a Super Natural being of an intelligent design. How can something of pure chance from chaos to order and complex patterns be intelligent and no being behind it all? This being must be super natural because nothing in the natural world could ever have done this otherwise we would have stupid design and not intelligent design.

[infinit888]

@npage85 by all means continue to be a pretentious asshat or... if you are really half as smart as you think you are you might be able to enlighten me where I went wrong.

Your pick.

[commanderkruge]

So not only a creationist returd but a racist too? That fits well. :)

Zipfilutscher.

[blueleadpot]

@PostITnoteGUY I just thought of something else you could ask him:

What is the scientific theory of intelligent design?