New Giant Skulls Found | Proof of Extraterrestrials?
Uploader Comments (extraterrestrialleak)
All Comments (60)
-
I've just realised that you believe in Nibiru/'Planet X' too *facepalm* I rest my case lol.
-
2#
........be done from birth whilst the skull is still supple. Seriously, do you not think it's a little more plausible that this is merely the result of head binding (which we know goes on) rather than them being the remnants of an alien race who has impossibly undergone the same evolution as us (though with a slight elongation of their skulls) travelling unquantifiable distances that would take them thousands of years to traverse? Is your life really so dull you need to invoke such nonsense?
-
1#
So you lied about seeing them in a museum (credibility = zero) & you're now proclaiming global conspiracy spanning generations involving the entire archaeological community? Ah the reek of desperation. Do you actually have any evidence to support that extraordinary claim?
Again, head-binding throughout history is well documented & still goes on to this day in certain parts of the world so I don't need to bind my own head to demonstrate this (lol) besides, it needs to.......
-
@ReptiIianFreemason Only a fool such as you can believe such a lie, why don´t you try binding your head to see if your skull elongates as much as those seen in the museum to have a real solid proof of what you say. I do not need to see them personally as I am not the one making lies to cover up the truth.
-
I have (eg. Pitt Rivers Museum in Oxford) & they all confirm that they are the result of head binding which still goes on today. Can i ask which museums you've visited that say otherwise or do you admit you haven't?
-
4>>
"We are both religious you fool!"
I follow no religion, i bow to nobody & i don't claim ultimate knowledge.
"only mine has better supporting evidence"
You have NO evidence otherwise it wouldn't be a 'faith system' you feckless dullard. The clue's in the name, it's not called a 'belief' for nothing *sigh*
-
3>>
........a fisting lunatic for claiming otherwise. Are you going to lie again & tell me there are paleontologists who believe this also?
"Don't you understand that saying we "evolved" from a single celled organism is equally "magical" to divine creation?"
Not in the slightest. We have the mechanism that have been directly observed that shows exactly how it happened. We've observed single celled organisms becoming multi-cellular on numerous occasions, no need to invoke the supernatural.
-
2>>
"How can you explain the massive amount of ancient artifacts depicting every kind of dinosaur alive?"
Blatant lie, that's nothing more than a hyperbole. What you're talking is a handful of examples like the odd cave-drawing which is far more easily explained by saying for instance that these people came across the exposed fossils of a dinosaur then drew what they believed them to have looked like. There is no question about it that man & dinosaurs did not co-exist & you're..........
-
1>>
"you can't possibly refute the evidence he presents so you continue on attacking the person to draw attention away from what they are saying."
Attacking creanderthals is too easy i know but what evidence have i been unable to refute?? I've addressed everything as far as i'm aware but if i've missed anything then then it wasn't intentional so let me know & i'll gladly highlight the error in your understanding. I have no need to bury my head to evidence like you.
-
4]
.........one you shameless liar. Science encourages skepticism & relies on observation & reason. It's religion that relies purely on authority meaning it's the religious who are brainwashed & who have to take everything on FAITH you goon.
"Unfortunately the majority of these are still too afraid to speak out against evolution"
Yet a window-licking, mindless maggot like you knows of this how exactly? Like i said, name one.
wow! that is really amazing info...thank u so much!!
somesortanaughty 6 months ago 2
@somesortanaughty your welcome!
extraterrestrialleak 6 months ago