Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss
This video is unlisted. Only those with the link can see it. Learn more

Reality in The Bible

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
8,284
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 1, 2009

An oldie but goodie that I was convinced to reupload after so many years.

Special thanks to Buckcash and Bubba for this video.
http://www.infidelguy.com

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (202)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I just did what bubba did...

    Bubba can't even use the website, or it's a crap website...

    biblegateway says it's in Colossians 2:17

    There seems to be reality in the bible, but to quote Jamie Hyneman: "I reject your reality and substitute it with my own" 8-)

  • I have proof that it's the cockroach that created the Earth not God. This doesn't say this in the bible but I have a book that SAYS that the cockroach created the Earth. How is this proof that this is correct? Because this book would not SAY it to be so. Since this book SAYS the cockroach created the Earth it must be TRUE! LOL! I hope you don't think my joke was corny, just trying to make a point.

  • That was really funny!!! LOL

  • THIS IS THE GREATEST!!!! THE WORD REALITY IS NOT IN THE BIBLE! LOL! STOMACH TIGHT RIGHT NOW! WOW!!!! THIS IS GOING IN MY FAVORITES RIGHT NOW DUDE! THATS IT! HUMANITY OVER. WERE DONE.

  • Circular logic is religion's best friend lol.

  • that was perty funny

  • google Doe's Account.

  • i can only repeat myself: the notion that there is a reality independent and outside of your mind is no inductive reasoning built upon empirical foundations. and still it's an assumption every science builds on. another example of necessary a priori assumptions (and how they can become a problem) is euclidean geometry.

    if you don't accept anything as given independent of testable evidence you won't get very far.

  • the same of course holds true for religious experiences. you can try to infer similarity of phenomenolocial experiences via similarity of their physiological similarities. but these comparisons have to be extremely crude because of the inherent interindividual differences of the physiological system. and (as in pain) it doesn't add anything to your prior knowledge of the phenomenological side of it.

    ...

  • ...and it does not tell me if the reason they give for their experience is the one they claim it to be.

    anyway: do you really think that my point about different kinds of rational beliefs is wrong?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more