The Case Against Fluoride Dr. Paul Connett 1/7

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,095
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 24, 2010

The official, "The Case Against Fluoride" book launching presentation at Whole Foods (Cherry Creek) in Denver, CO on Oct. 9th 2010 with co-author Paul Connett, PhD.
This incredibly enlightening presentation outlines the true dangers of water fluoridation and it's toxic effects.
On the eve of the new millennium, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), listed water fluoridation as one of the twentieth-century's 10 greatest public-health achievements. Yet according to the authors of this painstakingly researched expose of fluoridation's overall ineffectiveness and toxicity, endorsements such as these from the CDC and other health organizations are motivated more by face-saving politics than credible research. Fluoridation advocates who have previously branded detractors as conspiracy theorists and shills for junk science will be hard pressed to debunk the hundreds of peer-reviewed studies and sound scientific reasoning presented here. In demonstrating fluoridation's ineffectiveness, Dr. Paul Connett cites exhaustive evidence proving fluorides only benefits are topical, as in tooth brushing, as opposed to swallowing. But the case against fluorides alleged safety, even in small doses, is more alarming, with multiple studies showing fluorides probable complicity in lowered intelligence scores, thyroid dysfunction, hip fractures, and the ominously rising incidence of osteosarcoma in boys. The authors academic, hyperbole-free writing style serves them well in marshaling a series of facts that, all by themselves, expose fluoridation as a false panacea. It remains to be seen, however, whether the public-health community will give this landmark work due credit or continue to rubber stamp an outdated policy that, like bloodletting and trepanation, properly belongs on the scrap heap of sham medical interventions.

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The trouble is that the medical profesionals have to mindlessly parrot what they have been taught or they dont get their 100k+ a year, its disgusting really. Same with mercury in fillings, imagine telling people that murcury is good for you, here you go? The mind just boggles at the lack of consciousness these people have.

  • my pineal gland is white under mri due to calcification drs use the position of the white gland to determin if you have a tumour as it will be pushed to one side we dont need flouride in water it is a waist product from nuke stations ,distiled water reverses the process but u must also juice vedgies 4 minerals no spiriual growth ask on your next brain scan

  • @Xcelplus Paul Connett is coming to Mildura on February 20th, 2011. I will send you the link by P.M.

  • My chemistry professor is pro-fluoride. He organised a debate on fluoride a few years ago and told me he couldn't get anyone to front the anti-fluoride case.

    I assume he would debate anyone if they offered. If Paul or someone else wanted to debate him I'd be happy to organise it. City is Melbourne Australia.

  • yup I'm highly allergic

  • great vid

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more