2016 Olympic candidates' web sites' accessibility comparison: Tokyo vs Chicago vs Rio vs Madrid

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
554 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 29, 2009

You can see here which candidate puts more obstacles in the main threshold of its webs. I'm from Spain and have written several times in the last months to the public institutions of Madrid so they make possible to enter their sites without the www. prefix. Nothing has been achieved although the solution is done in 1 minute and costs 0 euros. This shows the "Spanish style" of some people over here (luckily we all are not the same -Barcelona was great & I'm not from that region-). What can be expected from these "professionals"? You can see more in http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxGBESJZDxo (NB: For Firefox behaving like shown first 2 automatic aids have to be disabled, like shown in http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dRgXoqt7eM )

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (edupedrito)

  • Madrid solved its problem at last. But after Rio got the organization. I hope the OCs of Spain and Brazil solve the problem soon too.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Which city will host the 2016 Olympic Games?
see all

All Comments (1)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more