Lord Monckton meets Greenpeace

Sign the petition! http://www.allpainnogain.org

Lord Christopher Monckton talks to a protester at the second International Climate Conference in Berlin co-sponsored by CFACT and several European think tanks. The conference included top scientists and experts, including Fred Singer, Nils Axel Mörner, Horst-Joachim Luedecke, and Henrik Svensmark.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Monckton
• Berlin
• Climategate
• Lord Monckton
• Christopher Monckton
• AllPainNoGain
• CFACT
• Climate
• Copenhagen
• Conference
• Summit
• Demonstration
• Greenpeace
• Debate
• Interview

[Wildkkat1]

Al Gore has refused many attempts by Lord Monckton to debate GW! Now I wonder why?

[Blukinski]

The Lord is very smart. He has a certificate in journalism instead of a degree in science or any training in science because the scientists are all frauds. He gets his data and facts from private sources, too, not from those so-called scientists who are being paid to lie and cheat. God bless the Lord.

[brennannnnnnnnnn]

@topologyrob You cannot prove a negative. The burden is on YOU to prove that their IS global warming. Lack of proof, or consensus, then lends credence to our assertion that GW is a farce. A man made idea that we actually have influence on our gobal eco system. We have a lot less clout there then you think...

[Chemtrailsexist]

Although Dr Pachauri of IPCC is often presented as a scientist (he was even once described by the BBC as “the world’s top climate scientist”), as a former railway engineer with a PhD in economics he has no qualifications in climate science at all. Dr Pachauri has established an astonishing worldwide portfolio of business interests with bodies which have been investing billions of dollars in organisations dependent on the IPCC’s policy recommendations.

[Chemtrailsexist]

""Although Dr Pachauri of IPCC is often presented as a scientist (he was even once described by the BBC as “the world’s top climate scientist”), as a former railway engineer with a PhD in economics he has no qualifications in climate science at all. Dr Pachauri has established an astonishing worldwide portfolio of business interests with bodies which have been investing billions of dollars in organisations dependent on the IPCC’s policy recommendations.""

[topologyrob]

@TheSWTORMMO Actually, I just look at the facts, as found in the evidence of science. If you have no evidence, don't you think you're on exceedingly shaky ground? Can you explain exactly how that is "objective"?

[TheSWTORMMO]

@topologyrob You take the side of bigger government and higher taxes. I'll continue to be objective on the matter. Good day to you, fool.

[topologyrob]

@TheSWTORMMO As we say in Oz, put up or shut up. If you can't substantiate your claims, they're just hot air. You're not persuading us with your fairy tale. Climate change denial is a fraud - there's not a shred of evidence. You can't even produce one when pressed.

[TheSWTORMMO]

@topologyrob I don't have time to sit here and cite thousands of sources that are readily available to the public. Like I said, if you're an educated person, go out and find them yourself... it's quite easy.

[topologyrob]

@TheSWTORMMO It's not very persuasive to simply assert this - what studies precisely are you referring to? I'm asking you to back up your claims, or remain very unconvincing.

[TheSWTORMMO]

@topologyrob The studies funded by the IPCC are selectively chosen. Legitimate peer reviewed journals circulate around all of the time that completely disprove the climate change scare. I suggest you do a little more research as I have.