Is Limited Government an Oxymoron? | Thomas E. Woods, Jr.
Top Comments
All Comments (335)
-
Good interview, but how is this "Is limited government an oxymoron?" If they answered the question, then didn't do so explicitly. And I am still not sure if Tom Woods is an anarchist or not. If he's a minarchist, I want to hear how he justifies his limited government morally and why he thinks it is good or necessary (i.e. does he think that the market would fail to provide the service of law or something?). And if he's an anarchist, then I would like to hear him say it. Thanks.
-
Liberty is on the move. When the day comes, everyone will benefit from freedom.
-
@MrJamesBP Why cannot radical positions be "the answer"? Because they are radical? So is relativity and quantum mechanics when compared to Newtonian physics. Doesn't make them less right. Either way, anarcho-capitalism does propose a way to "seal the wound" from the removal of the tumor that is government - various transitional states have been proposed, as well as the use of education (all that writing) to teach people why no government is better (thus minimizing the damage from removal).
-
Impressive stuff.
-
you tube is so stupid and limited pisoff you tube you dont respect free speeking i speek my mind diks if you are for not speeking agants coropsion you are stupid besides yutube sond riuns the cuality of my music all this tecnology and cant even ave cualety sond
-
A rattlesnake bite and some sleeping pills are the only way to go, Then and ONLY THEN do you have excellent health.
-
Limited government and few restrictions are the only way to go, Then and ONLY THEN do you have true freedom.
-
@MrJamesBP There are about a hundred hours of lectures on various anarcho-capitalist interests and I assure you there are about 3 ways at least for any question you can propose. Go look around if you have specific questions.
-
Nordic countries have the highest incidence of laissez-faire markets in the world. Socialism is not the cause of their prosperity. It was in fact social democratic policy that nearly crippled Sweden in the latter half of the 20th C
@newmind1 Neo-Cons? What are you a fuckin retard? Neo-Cons are big government right wingers, they are closer to Liberals then what these guys are advocating.
brokenbrainz1 1 year ago 36
@newmind1 First off, its not their, its they're in the context which you are speaking. Secondly....... No. Bush and Cheney were neocons.
Libertarians are NOT NEOCONS.
Would you call Thomas Jefferson a neocon? Seriously.
noyouaintgettingit 11 months ago 19