Quantum Mechanics Music Video
Uploader Comments (nageljr)
Top Comments
-
omg! this is awesome!
Video Responses
All Comments (60)
-
@nageljr I just wanted to criticize the former. but i'm glad it's already straight. love that stuff man.
-
@nageljr The math complexity is probably similar, but the concept of a curved space-time is far simpler than physical states represented by elements of a Hilbert space and observables by self-adjoint operators... not to mention the paradoxes of every interpretation fo QM I have heard of (Copenhagen, Many-Worlds...)
-
Hmm. I think there is a slightly misleading statement in the song. Wave-particle duality is not related to the wavefunction, which is a complete, probabilistc mathematical description of a system. De Broglie waves and particles actually (co-)exist, but the particle can be forced to become either depending on how we observe it.
-
This is almost my new favorite song
-
Why is Carl Sagan singing in the chorus? He's a cosmologist as far as I know and has no connection to QM. It might be because he's a popular science figure.
-
You are awesome!
-
@nageljr i dont understand the half you say but i agree xD
-
Why isn't Einstein among those singing the chorus?
-
@nageljr I totally agree with you. I have never gotten comfortable with tensors.
SIMPLER THAN RELATIVITY?! I DON'T THINK SO!!!!!!!!!!!!
tombombadil10000 1 year ago 3
@tombombadil10000
Haha! Most of QM requires a good understanding of partial differential equations and linear algebra. Relativity requires tensors. So really, its a question of which upper-level mathematics you're more comfortable with. For me, it was the former. Some people probably think the latter is easier. Although special relativity is certainly the winner since it only needs algebra.
nageljr 1 year ago 9
Are the lyrics posted somewhere?
skotrachelandriley 2 years ago 2
Read the video description.
nageljr 2 years ago 2
Nice video, but what does diffraction of *light* by a slit have to do with quantum mechanics (being quite a nice home-makeable proof for wave nature of light though)?
kieszta 2 years ago
Great question.
The demonstration is assuming you already believe that light consists of photons, and is not really a continuous wave. The thing we really wanted to show is that a stream of discrete photons distributed in a sinc-squared pattern (the little red-dot animation) produces a nearly identical pattern to the one you see with the laser interference. So really, I guess we should call it a "correspondence" demo, but whatever. It still looks cool, right? :)
nageljr 2 years ago 5