How Wrong are Young Earth Creationists

For my longtime subscribers, you will recognize this video as a repost, now reformatted without the apparently offending images of the holocaust, and with a voice over.

Science routinely debates errors on the order of a few percent, not 6 orders of magnitude like the error of young earth creationists. Their level of inaccuracy is absurd.

To download this video go to:
http://www.mediafire.com/?mrzituj

If you want to see the original (offensive) video go to:
http://www.mediafire.com/?39nkgwd5vwt

I'm pretty sure it was the image of the holocaust victims. Maybe someone should bring this to someone's attention, that YouTube is pulling videos that show victims of the holocaust.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Evolution
• Intelligent
• Design
• Creation
• Religion
• God
• Science
• Error
• Young
• Earth
• Age
• Date
• Thousand
• Million
• Billion
• Wrong
• Radiometric
• Bible
• Genesis
• Literal
• Week
• Universe
• Christian
• Evangelical
• Hovind
• Dembski
• Behe
• Ham
• Haggard
• Dawkins

[SuperDogbrown]

good work here

[ShawnsterVideos]

If you have enough time to produce a 3:22 video, then you have enough time to provide direct quotes from opposition. Why do you not give us video of a creationist, like Ken Ham or Kent Hovind, making the claims you attribute to them?

I'm on the side of science and skepticism. But by not including citations, quotes, or direct video of your detractors' claims, then you're just using the same 1-sided dogmatic argumentation techniques as a religious zealot.

[thybigballs]

I like your videos but this one did nothing for me. It was 3 minutes of extreme analogies. We get it already about the wild claims of YEC's but where was the substance for this video

[multisnootylives1]

I would like to see a creation scientist get ripped apart by a chimpanzee!

[EhdrianEh]

@Aralith1 Hmmm not too sure what is going on, but here is a quote similar to yours: "Or, at least, that’s what we thought. But if physicists at Stanford and Purdue are correct in their findings, the whole theory of constant radioactive decay rates could be thrown out the door." Feel free to contact the institutions conducting the research.

[Aralith1]

@EhdrianEh I did that before and it didn't work. Not really important though, as Forbes isn't a reliable source of scientific information. Find me an article from a peer reviewed journal and then you might have something. I highly doubt you will find one though, because if the strong and weak nuclear forces aren't constant, then it would wreak havoc for the entire universe, and we don't see that happening, nor have we found any indication (which would be major) that it has ever happened.

[EhdrianEh]

@Aralith1 Take the spaces out of the url prefix.

[Aralith1]

@EhdrianEh Your link seems to not be functioning, but I can tell you for a fact that the decay rates have not changed. The rate of decay is based upon the strong and weak nuclear forces, which make up two of the four fundamental forces in the universe that govern all physical interactions. If these were to change, EVERYTHING would change. And if this happened in the past 6000 years, it would either wipe out our civilization, or it would be one of the most recorded events in history.