Gay Bigots Protest at LDS "Mormon" Temple in L.A.

Bigotry is defined as: "intolerance towards those who hold different opinions from oneself."

In California, bigotry from the "No on 8" side has been widespread, venom and hate spewed forth, vandalism, destruction of property and endless thievery of yard signs.

Anti-Religious Bigotry in England resulted with William Tyndale burned alive in the 16th century for printing the English Bible. This was the "tolerance" for religion in England that pushed boatload after boatload of Englishman to the eastern seaboard of the United States, seeking freedom.

Thomas JeffersonJefferson swore eternal hostility toward any form of tyranny upon the mind of man: "I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."

Religious Liberty was of the highest order and concern to these colonists, and the very first of their spelled out "Bill of Rights" reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

So, the First Amendment was to keep the damned hand of government tyranny off of religion, for "Congress shall make no law" concerning religion, and neither shall the damned Soviet Courts in the United States today. Prop 8 was not an "anti-gay" measure, but a 1st Amendment measure to protect religion from the wicked courts who are hostile and seek an inroad at slaughtering the First Amendment. Judges the ilk of Governor Lilburn W. Boggs of Missouri with his infamous "extermination order" against the Mormon's are ready and anxious to criminalize religion if they can do so.

An example of these most wicked courts. Recently, the Soviet US District Court in San Francisco ruled that "parental rights are severed" when a child crosses the threshold of the school. Where did this Stalin/Mao/Hitlarian ruling come from? Straight from a tyrannical hell, a US Court that is as un-American as anything you hear of today. People 30 years ago would have laughed you to scorn if you would have predicted a court ruling could take place in America that followed the Marxist ideology of the USSR. But, here we are. Such Soviet rulings have been made and will continue to be made. That ruling enforced a plank of the Communist Manifesto.

Respecting religion and the "free exercise thereof," churches absolutely must defend against these damned, wicked courts who now "make law" which the 1st Amendment prohibits Congress from doing, regarding religion.

I hope, in a nutshell, this explains the real issue. What a damned lie to say this is "hate filled" by churches. Churches did not start this battle, but they shall be destroyed if they don't stand up and defend the 1st Amendment. It is their defense against hate filled judges who will begin criminalizing churches as soon as they can get an inroad to do so. Marriage as defined as a "man and a woman" is a buffer against such tyranny upon the 1st Amendment. Gay people can have every right and do so under the law. The only difference is their "domestic unions" are not given the legal definition to be a "marriage" which protects churches from a ruthless tyrannical government hell bent upon legislating it into oblivion by the Secularist High Priests of the State Religion of Secularism---the Judges.

Mormon's, more than any other people on earth today, perhaps, ought to know what governments can do, for in the 19th Century, the US Federal government sought to "destroy the LDS Church as an institution" as Gordon B. Hinckley expressed a while back. It is true, murder of leadership, their imprisonment, lootings, rape, robbings, plunder, seizure of assets, burning of temples, shutting down of temples, "extermination orders," it's all been had before, and is prophesied to transpire again. We're fools to let it come about easily by not seeking to ensure the 1st Amendment is of force, keeping judges damned hands from "making law" against religion and "the free exercise thereof." Thus, those crying that this is an unfair fight at "denying rights" from gay couples are liars, and the best line sophistry sold in the 2008 election year.

http://www.awakeandarise.org/article/lds_targeted.htm

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• gay
• mormon
• temple
• homosexual
• rights
• marriage
• prop
• california
• voters
• constitution
• amendment
• first
• speech
• freedom
• religi

[IantoCross]

Oh, poor ScuseMeJudge! I will say, your Mormon xenophobia is well-developed! I'm glad I got out when I did.

You are MISUSING the term bigot. It's NOT just defined as intolerance but also obstinacy & irrationality.

Yes we gays are obstinate about this, but are we irrational? No. After all, this is a fight about what the US Supreme Court called in 1967 "one of the basic civil rights of man".

Last time I checked, it WAS bigotry to deny basic civil rights. Shame on the Mormon bigots!

[j4unumber1]

Besides, any practitioner of a religion that believes that people after death can still be baptized and believes that God resides in some distant area of the universe called Kolob has no business using terms in the field of logic to make their points. After all, Mormon doctrine is such an irrational belief system that is completely devoid of logic. Mormon doctrine is arguably one of the most far-fetched and insane doctrines in the history of humankind. Joseph Smith was a fraud.

[CelticVictory]

@Nonamearisto You said that it was wrong to only go after Mormons and that the only groups that are ok to attack are pretty much anybody who disagrees with the liberals.

[Nonamearisto]

@CelticVictory Thanks. I don't remember what it is I am right about, but thanks. It's been a while since I was on this page.

[CelticVictory]

@geminyo Seculers also had slaves and supported slavery, you can't use a religious argument claiming that only they supported slavery when non-religious people did as well. Further, Christian and other religionists opposed slavery as well, not all supported it. You are very bad at proving your point.

[CelticVictory]

@Nonamearisto You are right.

[CelticVictory]

@geminyo I didn't say any of the quotes that you just wrote.

[Nonamearisto]

@hotflame2009 Because African-Americans have been singled out by US culture as "victims" who cannot be touched, even as we continue to imprison them and abort their kids at ludicrous rates.

[Nonamearisto]

@patrickledford420 And maybe you are a waste of oxygen yourself. What has convinced you that you are SO right?

[Nonamearisto]

It is wrong to single out the Mormons. One would also have to attack the Evangelicals, the Pentecostals, The Catholics, Most Muslims, Orthodox Jews, Orthodox Christians, most Hindus and Buddhists and... well, pretty much ANYone who isn't a member of an ultra-liberal protestant denomination, an ultra-liberal Jew, a lapsed Catholic an atheist, or an agnostic.

[geminyo]

@CelticVictory Oh, and nice dance moves. If I could sidestep issues like you, I would consider a job in professional apologetics. You just said "Sure they broke the law, but that still doesn't change the fact that the gays were protesting them out of hatred and nothing else..."

And made it sound like "Yeah, I know there are misunderstandings on both sides, but I hope we can all be friends..."

You got skills, my friend.

[geminyo]

@CelticVictory Heyyy! Yeah, the black populace has it's own problems. Once upon a time, your christians were using the slavery in the bible to justify the slavery in the U.S. Hell, mormons even believe that black people are the spirits who wouldn't take sides in the fight between jesus and his brother, lucifer, and that a pious life could turn them from black to white. I'm not making this up either.