Jackson Pollock Art

Jackson Pollock is rambunctious.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Jackson
• Pollock
• art
• music
• nonrepresentational
• american

[VicodinAddicted]

genius... thanx, nice vid

[lazyconquistador]

@VicodinAddicted Thanks a bunch, very much appreciated.

[Oddonan]

bull shit

pure bull shit

[lazyconquistador]

@Oddonan Are you referring to Pollock's work or just about the video in general?

[Oddonan]

@lazyconquistador

Pollock's work

[lazyconquistador]

@Oddonan Alrighty then.

[2099alex1]

I like the paintings at 0:54,1:24, 3:47 a lot. I can't say that I like all of Pollock's paintings. Maybe just five percent of his paintings are master pieces in my opinion. But most artist go their whole life without producing any world class master pieces weahter they are singers, directors, or painters(drafters or free form). I do not think that Pollock progressed all the the way. He went far but he hit plateau.

[VerumEs]

Art community and investments aside, I would like to say that I personally find many of Pollock's paintings to be pleasurable to look at (hence why I'm here). Of course not all of them are going to be great, but many of them are quite good to me. It's not for everyone, especially for younger people or those who simply don't care about artistic expression. I know that when I was younger I thought this all was a sham too, but I guess that time and experience just changed my perception on things.

[fripertronics]

@Oddonan your a little behind the curve.

[fripertronics]

I don't think the soundtrack is particularly good. Dead Can Dance would have been better, but I like the presentation all the same.

[10skylark]

this is brilliant imo but mind boggling as well, there's so much everytime i look at it.

[RatafakTehPlachta]

@Oddonan I dont think that anybody is capable of doing this. First of all, he came up with the idea. With the technique. Something new. And second of all, he very well knew what he was doing. The paintings are (at least for me) aesthetically very fulfilling. Not because I want to be interesting or because I am scared to be shat on by some fucking pseudointellectuals. I simply like them. They are alive, vivid, imaginative. End of story.

[Oddonan]

@RatafakTehPlachta

you think painting made by drunken man and anyone can do it is outstanding and you want to talk about logic with you?

The art community they are the one decided that they put crappy arts in book history.

[RatafakTehPlachta]

@Oddonan i dont give a flying fuck about any art community, in fact, i hate people who claim to be artists, yet I think that Pollock´s works are outstanding. Your glorious logic failed.

[afaf233]

@Oddonan the art is in selling something for a lot of money that is not worth anything but there is enough idiots out there willing to participte in the pyramid scam of making a bum make millions....its not art if anyone one vcan do it...and everyone is very capable of scribbling total nonsense on a canvas and call itb a work of art...

[afaf233]

@Oddonan oh yes the art community is a well organised mafia and its in thier interest to say the art is good so that they can sell and make money and commissions and once an artist catches on they pump the bs up real good to make money knowing that they have hit jackpot seeing so many diots belive in the lies....its a good con...its the second best con to the age old business of fortune telling and propstitution....