The Cloud Mystery 5/6
Top Comments
All Comments (13)
-
Ok so the ocean temp data at 50m correlate well with our solar activity but how about ground surface temps and satelite temps? Do they correlate well for the last 26 to 46 years?
-
@peteyOZ yea we're in the age of pices now right? used to be the ram, soon will be aquarian age. think they say about 2,200 years or so... it's wherever constellation that the north pole is pointing at during the vernal equinox.
thats my guess on that
-
The constellations do change... isnt it called the procession of the equinox or something? Past astrologers were aware of it and it was always factored into their observations.
Sunspots would affect the magnetic radiation that inhibits the cosmic rays, that explains the variations every 11 years. That doesnt discount the effect of the position of the solar system i wouldnt think. Maybe it adds or subtracts to the effect?
-
A scientist? they are all doing it brother. they've killed science in favor of their ideology.
-
It also has to do with the suns magnetic field being week or strong and therefore letting in more or less cosmic rays. Those are the small changes we see on a decade basis.
-
that one piano sample they borrowed from american beauty is getting really old by now.
-
Looks quite valid to me.
-
"Have to see how other scientist will receive the work and data. "
Then no one will publish...
The truth is not what they tell you....its what they will not publish.
thanks for this video.
Svensmarks ideas would stop the massive tax funded CO2 research funding...that is why he cannot get it published.
People talk about Big oil corrupting science...how about Big government doing the same.
Science with a bias is not science.
AGW theory is about funding for jobs programs...just like most nonsense in government...create a crisis and the funding goes up...
it works with war as well as climate.
Best way to get rich is to create a crisis and get gov to sanction your monopoly product...
seaplaneguy1 2 years ago 21
Credible and fascinating science rejected because it is "not interesting"? Pull the other one. The phoney and silly excuses for rejection were simply because those corrupt AGW nutters were blocking papers that challenged their dogmas, just as the climategate files reveal. How low can a scientist go? Very low, it seems.
73elephants 2 years ago 19