@TheSHORTKID7 GAHAHAHAHAHAA NO TRAITS OF ESPLOSIVE MATERIAL AT WTC SITE, how fucking ignorant can you be to believe that? YOU BADLY want to believe that. The government got NIST to do all the "investigation", and they admitted they never looked nor tested for explosive material, why? Because their employers told them not to. Thousands, yes thousands of non government experts checked the dust and it ALL 100% samples contained unreacted nano thermite chips, you brainless monkey.
We don't need to disprove your fairy tales we are disproving the official story which is NIST. Get a clue. NIST never factored in any of the pelting from WTC1 when it did it's simulation. This is the pelting that Edgeman was saying helped weaken the structure. So, I guess Edgemann and other official story followers don't believe in defending NIST's report and simulation. Fire alone is what NIST says brought down WTC7. Think about all the reasons fire alone can't do this.
@charlesfloyb <--in addition to exposing himself as a Believer of NIST, and a pussy who wont hit reply because he so fears the smackdown he KNOWS he will get, Charles the Retard is also an illiterate little bitch, who has the reading comprehension of a carrott.
It was RBA to referenced "pelting." Not me. ooops!
Still wating for Charlestheretard to show us any examples of a 47 story building magically hovering for 18 seconds after all resistance was removed. =]
Great Video - have a look at my site
MotherwellScotland 2 months ago
press 2 to see a man rape another man
PSPFREAK201 4 months ago
@radsimu wow! thats an amazing comment bro! best comment on youtube
zeekisathinker 4 months ago
@TheSHORTKID7 GAHAHAHAHAHAA NO TRAITS OF ESPLOSIVE MATERIAL AT WTC SITE, how fucking ignorant can you be to believe that? YOU BADLY want to believe that. The government got NIST to do all the "investigation", and they admitted they never looked nor tested for explosive material, why? Because their employers told them not to. Thousands, yes thousands of non government experts checked the dust and it ALL 100% samples contained unreacted nano thermite chips, you brainless monkey.
Xendrius 6 months ago
is there nothing I can't masterbaute to?
Djalkoe 7 months ago 2
google scholar search active thermitic materials
wow, that's right
scientists have found high-tech explosive in the dust from the wtc buildings
152czar 8 months ago
@charlesfloyb Sooo, Charles ADMITS he has no proof to the contrary.
Another Succesfful debunking.
Edge wins!
EdgemanLL2 9 months ago
We don't need to disprove your fairy tales we are disproving the official story which is NIST. Get a clue. NIST never factored in any of the pelting from WTC1 when it did it's simulation. This is the pelting that Edgeman was saying helped weaken the structure. So, I guess Edgemann and other official story followers don't believe in defending NIST's report and simulation. Fire alone is what NIST says brought down WTC7. Think about all the reasons fire alone can't do this.
charlesfloyb 10 months ago
STILL waiting Charles. Where is it?
EdgemanLL2 10 months ago
@charlesfloyb <--in addition to exposing himself as a Believer of NIST, and a pussy who wont hit reply because he so fears the smackdown he KNOWS he will get, Charles the Retard is also an illiterate little bitch, who has the reading comprehension of a carrott.
It was RBA to referenced "pelting." Not me. ooops!
Still wating for Charlestheretard to show us any examples of a 47 story building magically hovering for 18 seconds after all resistance was removed. =]
EdgemanLL2 11 months ago