Central Dogma

"Central dogma" is a molecular biological concept, which Francis Crick advocated in 1985. It means that genetic information is transferred from DNA to protein through several steps such as DNA replication, transcription, translation, and protein production.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• CentralDogma
• central
• dogma
• gene
• genome
• DNA
• RNA
• science
• biology

[xenabss]

very good, really liked it

[dapiridoob]

THE ONLY DOGMA I BELIEVE IS IN CENTRAL DOGMA! :D

[hongmancho10]

this is by far the best molecular biology video i have ever watched. I wish they just turn on this video instead of teaching in the molecular biology lecture.

[hahaOSAMAhaha]

@jrlmenezes1 

[jrlmenezes1]

the translator got it wrong. The central dogma is from 1958 not 1985. And in 1958, the code wasn't broken yet. So the transfer rna and messenger RNS were not even figured, only that there were intermediaries between dna and protein. Incredible feat. By 1970, more was know and the "dogma" was reiterated in its present form

[Cannibalope]

Why does Japanese make things sound so much simpler? Yay for this video

[olga2415]

@YurNotSpecial before a cell can replicate there must be information flow; right? I am not a trained physicist and am not looking to be agreed or disagreed with. I am trying to understand this issue of why I am reading so many articles criticizing Crick's explanation of DNA re not only replication re HIV/ AIDs, but genetically modified foods issue. It is complicated to the point that not even physicists agree; why would I deign to look for an agreement or disagreement here on the comments site?

[YurNotSpecial]

@olga2415 Kinda hard to agree or disagree when no argument has been put forward; although, this statement is a bit telling: "It was an article regarding HIV/AIDs issue and they harked back to Crick's DN A "flawed" replication dogma."

Please bear in mind the central dogma pertains to information flow in a cell, not replication.

[YurNotSpecial]

@dumtadum I would recommend looking into it! Specifically regarding this statement: "tRNA is a protein..."

[olga2415]

@YurNotSpecial If I understood it better, I'd be able to be clearer about my statements. lol I am struggling to understand the conflict between Crick and some of his critics. It seems important to some who write their papers. I tried to find the hard copy I have of a site on the issue and tore up my computer room files and cannot put my hand on it. I know I have it somewhere. It was an article regarding HIV/AIDs issue and they harked back to Crick's DN A "flawed" replication dogma.