GOD OF WONDERS pt.3.(E=MC2)

Science/nature program giving glory to God the creator, rather than promoting
evolutionary propaganda.
FOR MORE INFO OR TO ORDER FULL COPIES GO TO: http://godofwondersvideo.org/

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Science
• nature
• creator
• God
• space
• animals
• fish
• hummingbirds
• flowers

[xSnapper26x]

"I agree that science cannot detect God, but it can detect the evidence that he exists."

By that I mean that we can not detect evidence for his existence so therefore we cant detect him either. Those two things basically mean the same thing.

Also you said "So I understand Y you don't believe." at the end. If you understand why I don't believe, obviously because of some of the reasons I have given (correct me if I'm wrong) then why do you yourself believe, just curious ???

[Ddrum7]

@xSnapper26x "Those two things basically mean the same thing." I disagree. If a painter paints a drawing & it's found later without having been signed, that is evidence he exists, though we don't know who he is. Since we observe the creation of God everywhere we look it's obvious that he exists. "y do you believe" I explained previously, I have received spiritual birth from God through Jesus & experience him in a supernatural way every day of my life. You have not, that is why u don't believe.

[asherasator]

Radium releases Alpha particles which are Helium & have mass yet Radium loses no mass! In Standard Model physics this also break the 1st law of Thermodynamics. In order for the first law to stick then it even points to an interaction of Radium with Aether or a finer material to pull energy from. All this reality has been under everybody's nose the whole time.

The formula has no basis in reality: If c is a speed limit how can there be a c^2? What observed fact of nature is it formulated from?

[asherasator]

E=mc^2 is completely wrong. Radium doesn't lose any mass yet is releases incredible amounts of energy, Einstein took the formula from Olinto DePretto & applied it in ways that it wasn't for. He hoped Madame Curie would prove the formula yet reality of Radium proved otherwise.

& fission is the knocking of neutrons from deuterium "heavy water" with radioactive material, & fusion is conversion of Hydrogen into Helium by electron capture is just basic chemistry & has nothing to do with E=mc^2.

[Ddrum7]

@xSnapper26x Obviously most religions are wrong. Jesus rose people from the dead including himself after 3 days & nights, whereas mohamed, nor any other has. So I trust Jesus word over his or any others. Watch my video series: "Embalmed Dead Man Resurrected by God!" to see a well documented modern resurrection & testimony.

[xSnapper26x]

@Ddrum7 Also

Christianity:

Believe in Jesus: Go to heaven

Don't Believe in Jesus: Go to Hell

Islam:

Believe in Jesus: Go to Hell

Don't Believe in Jesus: Go to Islamic Heaven and get like 50 virgins :P

And so on for all the other religions of the world ...

From what ive seen, religion seems to run in families and also seems to be determined by the geographical location and time at which you are born, America: Mostly christian, Middle East: Moslem, Medieval Greece, all the Greek gods etc ...

[Ddrum7]

@xSnapper26x I agree that science cannot detect God, but it can detect the evidence that he exists. I also agree the 5 natural senses cannot detect God & only sense his creation, but the spiritual ones can. Sin has brought death to the spirit of mankind & that is why he cannot see, hear, or sense him. The only way a person can see the kingdom of God is if he is born again spiritually. Otherwise he remains spiritually dead & a dead man cannot sense anything. So I understand Y you don't believe.

[xSnapper26x]

@Ddrum7 OK fair enough, just because we cant see gravity, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist I agree. Sight is just one of a few senses available to humans. We can't see music or sound / sonic waves, but we can hear it / them :) I agree with you but not to the degree that science can detect GOD with any senses because there isn't really any senses that humans can use to detect GOD as senses are the only human tools that we can use we use to interpret data and evidence and determine its validity

[Ddrum7]

@xSnapper26xI really appreciate the apology& honest question.There are many things we can't see yet there is ample evidence it exists.Gravity is 1 example.When we observe a painting but not the one who painted it the logical conclusion is not "I guess this painting just rained down from the sky since I don't see who made it." It's the same with creation. Birds bees flowers trees, the ability to taste/enjoy food & decipher poison, cells divide & become hearts,lungs,brains,arms legs,hands,feet etc

[xSnapper26x]

@Ddrum7 OK then I'll stop insulting you :) But I can't understand why someone would reject a very well established scientific theory about life when there is so much evidence for it. We can't actually see GOD or detect him with any of our senses so how are we to know that he is there. I'm just curious as to why you believe these things. There has been many religions before Christianity ... I'm sorry for insulting you, I just get very frustrated sometimes ...