Dr Zakir Naik Vs Dr William Cambell Prt2 ( 1 of 7 )

This is the Second segment of the Debate and it will contain 7 parts to it

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• islam
• debate
• christian
• william
• campbell
• zakir
• naik
• quran

[Mondozay]

MASHALLAHA IT IS CLEAR THAT HOW SMART AND CLEVER DR ZAKIR IS.. LOOK AT DR CAMPELL AND THE OTHERS WHO IS USING PAPERS AND NOTS TO LOOK AT IT FROM.. MASHALLAH DR ZAKIR HAS ALL THE QURAN IN HIS HEAD ..

[sahirdonsocomeon]

@ledgendgoku1 Which Bible out of the 24000 different ones?

[zimbo808]

this guy must be dumbest dumass

[Na123ism]

For those who are not Islam,You just dont understand how good Islam is.Do not misundertands our religions.Our religion still believe in god.For your knowledge,we worship the same god as Jews does.

[yusaf203]

THIS IS PROOF THAT ISLAM IS THE TRUTH, WILLIAM CAMBELL IS BLIND PLZ MUSLIMS PRAY THAT ALLAH GIVES HIM SENSE

[sinyogi]

refutation to naik: nobiblicalcontradiction (dot) wordpress (dot) com

[loveforyou66]

@ledgendgoku1 Arabs did all of that!Yes,I agree with that.Arabs were pagans at that time.Prophet Muhammad was an Arab.NOT a pagan.he didn't believe in any of their superstitious beliefs.He was chosen to change those people and the rest of the world.Dont just read what other people say.If you want to know what it is really, then read the Quran.That is the right way to understand the religion.Read the Quran.If you are going to say something,you should atleast know what you are talking about.

[loveforyou66]

@ledgendgoku1 This is completely stupid!Why would Allah ask us to worship others when He claims He is the ONE & ONLY GOD?The whole point of the Quran is to prove that He is the Only One who is worthy of worship!And No!There is no daughter or son to Allah.Refer to Surah Ikhlas-112.Please just dont pull out words from stupid websites and paste it here.Or if you are going to use websites as proof,atleast pick one written by sm1 who knows the religion well! you pasted Daniel Pipes' words.

[ledgendgoku1]

@loveforyou66 Were al-Lat, al-Uzza and Manat called “the daughters of Allah”? Yes.

Yusuf Ali explains in fn. 5096, pg. 1445, that Lat, Uzza and Manat were known as “the daughters of God [Allah]”

Did the Qur’an at one point tell Muslims to worship al-Lat, al-Uzza and Manat? Yes. In Surah 53:19-20.

Have those verses been “abrogated” out of the present Qur’an? Yes.

What were they called? “The Satanic Verses.”

i rest my case

[ledgendgoku1]

@loveforyou66 Was the title “al-ilah” (the god) used as the Moon-god? Yes

Was the word “Allah” derived from “al-ilah?” Yes

Was the pagan “Allah” a high god in a pantheon of deities? Yes.

Was he worshipped at the Kabah? Yes.

Was Allah only one of many Meccan gods? Yes

Did they place a statue of Hubul on top of the Kabah? Yes.

At that time was Hubul considered the Moon-god? Yes.

Was the Kabah thus the “house of the Moon-god”? Yes.