1960 http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0394495179?ie=UTF8&tag=doc06-20&link... Watch the full film: http://thefilmarchived.blogspot.com/2010/10/house-divided-1960.html
After the upheaval of the American Revolution effectively ended in 1781 at the Battle of Yorktown, the South became a major political force in the development of the United States. With the ratification of the Articles of Confederation, the South found political stability, with little federal interference in state affairs. However, with this stability came weakness by design, and the inability of the Confederation to maintain economic viability eventually forced the creation of the United States Constitution in Philadelphia in 1787. Importantly, Southerners of 1861 often believed their secessionist efforts and the Civil War paralleled the American Revolution, as a military and ideological "replay" of the latter.
Southern leaders were able to protect their sectional interests during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, preventing the insertion of any explicit anti-slavery position in the Constitution. Moreover, they were able to force the inclusion of the "fugitive slave clause" and the "Three-Fifths Compromise". Nevertheless, Congress retained the power to regulate the slave trade, and 20 years after the ratification of the Constitution, Congress prohibited the importation of slaves effective January 1, 1808. While North and South were able to find common ground in order to gain the benefits of a strong Union, the unity achieved in the Constitution masked deeply rooted differences in economic and political interests. After the convention, two emerging understandings of American republicanism came to loggerheads.
For the North, a Puritanical republicanism predominated, with leaders such as Alexander Hamilton and John Adams. In the South, Agrarian republicanism formed the basis of political culture. While both attempted to preserve their "way of life" in order to preserve the Union, their methods of this preservation were quite different. While Northern republicans aimed to make better people and thus ensure the survival of democracy, Southerners focused on making better conditions. Led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the Agrarian republican position is characterized by the epitaph on the grave of Jefferson. While including his "condition bettering" roles in the foundation of the University of Virginia, and the writing of the Declaration of Independence and the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, absent was his role in the federal government as president of the United States. Southern development of political thought thus focused on the ideal of the yeoman farmer; i.e., those who are tied to the land also have a vested interest in the stability and survival of the government.
In the decades immediately following the ratification of the Constitution, slavery in the South continued without substantial opposition from the North. Slavery was legal and practiced in most States, north and South. Though some in the North viewed slavery as a moral issue, most were indifferent, and some even believed that the abolition of slavery would be detrimental to their economic interests. As for Southerners, before the cotton boom, large plantations with dozens or hundreds of slaves were rare, and usually found in the Deep South. The vast majority of Southerners never owned slaves. Most were independent yeoman farmers much like their counterparts in the North. Nevertheless, the slave system represented the basis of the Southern social and economic system, and thus even non-slaveowners often violently opposed any suggestions for terminating that system, whether through abolition or gradual emancipation.
Loading...
2:19
Abraham Lincoln - A House Dividedby mrsox19791,035 views
@8bitsurrender A slave by definiton is alot like a child, they arent in a position to make a yes or no to sex. If the woman was freed, fine she says yes. If the man who OWNS you ask for sex, what does she say? No thank you Ill take my 30 lashes
guitargold77 3 weeks ago
@guitargold77 so if jefferson had sex with a slave and then had a child with that woman, this automatically constitutes this sexual encounter as rape? what sort of logic is that?
8bitsurrender 3 weeks ago
@sarahanne127 no but nice one.
MsSomaligirl 2 months ago
@guitargold77 Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, Jackson, Van Buren, Harrison, Tyler, Polk, Taylor, Johnson, and Grant all owned slaves at some point in their lives (12 of the first 18 US presidents).
KayBeeEee1983 6 months ago
ah blake and white
36tom100 9 months ago
I live in Sunderland , its a city on the north east coast of England . our public library has a cornerstone when it was built in 1895 and one of the names on the stone is Grant , union general ! no one seems to know why ? very strange.
dave2806 1 year ago
The confederacy is america at its worst, idiocy. Jefferson, Grant, Washington and Jackson need to be removed from our money as slave owners, If Jefferson had a child with one then he was a rapist too, Hamilton and Franklin owned to release Lincoln had none, anyway a fool spins history means little to those kidnapped and bound to a owner, a owner like George Washington,, maybe older he regretted, but that still dont erase his crime
guitargold77 1 year ago
The confederacy is slandered with the history of slavery....yet the United States allows slaughtering of babies through genocide.
IslandersMets10 1 year ago