Richter plays Liszt Vallée d'Obermann part 2
Uploader Comments (xujia1001)
Top Comments
-
great pictures
-
c est grandios mais il me manque l espressivo de Horowitz ici. Ricter est moins dramatique face a la tragique de cette piece. Horowitz comprenait mieux l intention de Liszt . C est l ouevre le plus dramatique et profonde de Liszt.
Video Responses
All Comments (21)
-
BRAVO!!
-
@madeliefffje Funny I wasn't reading the comments, but I just noticed it and was about to type the same question. I also have an older manuscript of the piece but it doesn't mention it either. I think it was a small mistake in the performance.
-
Horowitz's '66 Columbia live recording blows this performance out of the water.
-
@madeliefffje even the greater minds make mistakes... :) they're human after all.
-
@uhartchristian Oui je suis d accord avec vous. J adore Richter mais Horowitz comme vous le dites si bien interprete cette oeuvre avec une expressivite incroyable
. Dans le Crescendo final, Horowitz fait sonner les basses d une maniere unique et avec une palette de couleurs merveilleuses. Il raconte une histoire, un drame.
Richter le joue tres bien mais il n a pas cette magie (meme si dans dans d autres registres il est unique bien sur).
-
Thank you very much for this video!
-
There is no magical things with pedals...
He hears the "Liquidity" of the harmonies and he makes it to sound.
It is a matter of hearing in the first place.
-
@Sagitta1986 : exactly: it does not matter. This is a great live recording, with a good interpretation of an absolutly superb peace of music!
-
5:57 "cough!...!"
-
Wow, you actually thought this was better than Horowitz's recording?
does he make a mistake on 2.29 or is it just an other version?
madeliefffje 2 years ago
Thanks for mentioning this point, I certainly didn't notice it before:-) Well, it's not the same thing written on my score neither, but harmonicall what he played had no problem at all.
xujia1001 2 years ago