The usual trigonometry is overly complicated, inaccurate and logically dubious. This is the first of a series that shows you a better way---rational trigonometry!
The usual trigonometry is overly complicated, inaccurate and logically dubious. This is the first of a series that shows you a better way---rational trigonometry!
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Fascinating , but I still don't see the advantages of treating geometry like this instead of with sines and cosines and the like. Does it have any applications in physics say harmonic analysis?
I agree that from what I've seen so far, rational trig is both interesting and easier for students to learn.
As for a specific triangle, we could have a 90 - 67.5 - 22.5 triangle, for example. If the hypotenuse has length 1, the other two sides have lengths 1/2*sqrt(2 + sqrt(2)) and 1/2*sqrt(2 - sqrt(2)).
It's not true that there are only two triangles students can work out by hand. I worked out by hand just now that
cos(pi/8) = 1/2*sqrt(2+sqrt(2))
I'm a fan of this new rational trig stuff, but you should at least be fair to the status quo.
My guess is that your ideas will catch on better if you say, "Hey, here's an interesting new way to think about trigonometry," rather than "I figured out the correct, proper, elegant, superior formulation of trig and everyone else in the world is wrong."
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
I think I am fair to the status quo. Most students would struggle with triangles that were quite different from the 90-45-45 and 90-60-30 examples.
Your example is a cosine. What triangle are you thinking of?
The reality is that Rational Trig is simply a lot better than the current approach. Please keep watching more of the series, and find out why.
I agree that from what I've seen so far, rational trig is both interesting and easier for students to learn.
As for a specific triangle, we could have a 90 - 67.5 - 22.5 triangle, for example. If the hypotenuse has length 1, the other two sides have lengths 1/2*sqrt(2 + sqrt(2)) and 1/2*sqrt(2 - sqrt(2)).
cos(pi/8) = 1/2*sqrt(2+sqrt(2))
I'm a fan of this new rational trig stuff, but you should at least be fair to the status quo.
My guess is that your ideas will catch on better if you say, "Hey, here's an interesting new way to think about trigonometry," rather than "I figured out the correct, proper, elegant, superior formulation of trig and everyone else in the world is wrong."