Royal Thai Navy :: Naval Powers!! Version 2.0
Uploader Comments (ZeroCraft)
Top Comments
-
Damn it ,I found you all around in thai's armed force vids and post some of child-like reply ......I think you're jobless aren't you ?
-
@Phillippines30.........honest
ly i dun think it costs as much as yours since it wasn't a huge aircraft carrier and it had been operated since 1996 or1997 so it was almost 13-14 years now.......so the cost of it at the time was probably lower compared to what it should be now.........the carrier itself was simply the smallest carrier compared to others around the world....however i think it's sufficient enougn in protecting our country and suitable for our military strategy (defensive style) thx
All Comments (95)
-
@natde329 เรือหลวงจักรีเป็นเรือสำหรับใช้
ในการบรรทุ ฮ. ครับ -
okaz,wrong intel
-
@ruins161, Infact shes classed as a CVL, thats a light carrier, shes not an amphibious warship atall.
-
in fact,chakri naruebet is an Amphibious assault ship
-
@kiziroglualper Turkey is better, and I believe that your military can beat Israel like shit hahahaha
-
เห็นแล้วก็เบื่อทะเลาะกันเอง...
...... -
Thailand has no need for aircraft carriers, she isnt even a major regional power, never mind a world Great power, a waste of money for such a minor nation, the Aussies should have bought it off them when it was new.
-
@mamibushi สันดารอย่างมึง ผิดเต็มๆเลยไอควาย
-
look at the argument below....dude...
video is just a video you right! but some of our people's attitude is not....
I just want you guys thinking about it...
However... Nowadays, Our military power is enough for defend our country...
ZeroCraft 9 months ago 12