'Secession from the Federal Empire'

http://www.slmnews.com/index.html Here are Tucker Carolson, Pat Buchanan, Don Kennedy and Dr Michael Hill all speaking about the promblems in America - and finally Dr Hill proposes a solution - secession from the Federal Empire. It's time for liberty and self-determination - which can not be gained while in the Empire.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• tucker
• carlson
• pat
• buchanan
• don
• kennedy
• dr
• michael
• hill
• secession
• liberty
• freedom
• neocons
• democrats
• south
• confederate

[victor1566]

Yes, the Confederacy was filled with idiots. Secession is just helping the enemy of today which is:

Iran,the Taliban,the Unified European Socialists, the Restructured Russian Mafia a.k.a. the Bureaucracy of Russia, and Totalitarian Communist China.

America is not the only big kid on the block and if you don't get out there and compete you will be swallowed up by other countries

like China or Europe or the Sultanates. This is why Sucession is not a good idea.

[RedShirtArmy]

By that logic we need to belong to an ever-expanding empire. I'm sure that the English told the Irish & the Scottish the exact same thing. I'm sure the Romans told the Gauls the same thing. I'm sure all empires tell the componant parts this lie - that we must all be bond together or we'll be swallowed up. This is not true.

[Arkben4south]

Yes were being watched. However,talking on here is not seen as a threat. The numbers are to scattered, and it that, just talk. We should use this as a vehical to attract people from our individual states, and then form a group or groups outside these means. Just as redshirtarmy states, talking about secession is not illegal. Nor is the actual act. At one time it was practiced.

[RedShirtArmy]

Exactly, man. That's what we're doing in SC already. SLMNews is certainly willing to work with any Southron nationalist to help build support in your local area. This is already being done on a small scale. There is nothing but commitment holding us back from expanding into something much larger.

[nomadak47]

Is there a forum to go to and have more of a discussion? Obviously resentment of the Federal Government policies runs high. If there is no forum maybe one should get started. Also one must realize Federal monitoring of this activity on youtube is happening. And a forum would be monitored as well.

[RedShirtArmy]

Undoubtedly. However, talking about secession is not illegal. It's a constitutional principle.

[ClearFire1]

Secession. Work for it.

[brainerdrebel]

Don't participate in the empire's illegal election. Don't legitimate the process by participating. Stop buying, buy local, fee markets, etc. stop feeding the beast, with taxes.

[SovereignStatesman]

@JOMO59

Unfortunately everyone is batshit INSANE-- you tell them the states are sovereign nations, and they start babbling about "divided sovereignty--" which is like cutting a baby in half in divorce. They are THAT clueless.

They are so brainwashed that they can't see straight no matter what you tell them.

[JOMO59]

@SovereignStatesman Yes understood i agree with your clarification. Of course, it makes perfect sense.

[SovereignStatesman]

@JOMO59

Watch my video and you'll see the hard facts: the North engaged in a false-flag war of outright imperialism under false claim of "civil war," and censored the truth to DATE: i.e. that each state was ALWAYS a sovereign nation, not part of a SINGLE nation.

Unfortunately, today the South agrees that the US IS a single nation, but ALSO claims they had the right to secede-- and that IS crazy, since it's an oxymoron.

There is NO SUCH THING as a right to secede from a sovereign nation.

[JOMO59]

@SovereignStatesman Yes that is a good technical clarification, i agree.But I hope you got my point. The North always tries to pretend that The South is crazy for asserting its right to legally remain independent from federal tyranny and even to secede. But thanks

[SovereignStatesman]

@brainerdrebel

Yes, but it involves my completing my global communications-network which also gives everyone free statellite television and radio. Because otherwise, nobody will listen.

The website is TheU-Net.com .

Do you know anyone who's good at making videos? I'm working on one for it, right now.

[brainerdrebel]

@SovereignStatesman, very good. You have a wealth of knowledge. Do you see anyway of reclaiming our states and limited federal government?

[SovereignStatesman]

First, state sovereignty must be DEFINED.

Currently, too many "Tenthers" think that "state sovereignty" is what's in the Tenth Amendment-- which clearly states RESERVED POWERS. In fact, 28 states passed laws saying that "state sovereignty" is under the Tenth Amendment, when in reality it's in the TREATY OF PARIS, where each state is recognized to be "free, sovereign and independent STATES--" i.e. SOVEREIGN NATIONS.

And that was NEVER CHANGED-- merely SUPPRESSED.

(cont'd)

[SovereignStatesman]

@brainerdrebel

(cont'd) Then, state sovereignty must be ASSERTED-- i.e. the people of a state must ASSERT to the federal government, and the other states-- and the other nations of the world-- that they are a sovereign nation unto themselves, BY LAW-- and PROVE it-- and that the PEOPLE of the state, not the state government, are the REIGNING SOVEREIGNS.

Then, they can nullify federal laws at will-- or secede entirely, and the fed will have NO authority to overrule them.

[brainerdrebel]

@SovereignStatesman, I understand and agree with state sovereignty. My question, was war the best way to defend state sovereignty? Obviously not, our federation of states is over, the federalists have won the battle of state sovereignty. The average college graduate thinks we are a nation or a country, they will quote the pledge of allegiance. Not knowing who wrote it or when. Nothing short of a revolution will bring back our Constitutional Republic.

"We federated for foreign affairs only" T.J.

[SovereignStatesman]

@brainerdrebel

No, the South fought to DEFEND ITS NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY AGAINST TREACHEROUS AGGRESSION.

The states were united on the principle of mutual respect for the respective national sovereignty of each other as separate nations-- but the north BETRAYED that trust, as wel as the militarypower entrusted to them for the purpose of DEFENDING it.

Why did the South fight?

Well when one nation claims that it OWNS another and invades to use force, that's the NORMAL response for ANY nation.