MoonFaker: Reflect On This. PART 1

This film took considerably longer to finish than expected due to severe computer problems on my end.

There have been many photographs taken from the various Apollo missions showing brightly lit objects that should be in shade. Conspiracy theorists believe fill-lights or reflectors were used to fill in the shadows. Propagandists claim that it's just light bouncing off the lunar surface that's causing the illumination.

In this video Jarrah White responds to the Mythbusters, ZigZag Productions and Jay Windley by doing what no propagandists has bothered to do - get the albedo right.

Watch what happens when we shoot photographs of shadowed objects on an asphelt surface. We know that the moon has an average albedo of 0.07. According to the American Concrete Pavement Association, this is within the vicinity of the albedo of asphelt - which makes it the perfect surface material for testing the lunar reflectivity.

http://www.pavement.com/Downloads/RT/RT3.05.pdf

Asphalt
0.05 - 0.10 (new)
0.10 - 0.15 (weathered)

Gray Portland cement concrete
0.35 - 0.40 (new)
0.20 - 0.30 (weathered)

White Portland cement concrete
0.70 - 0.80 (new)
0.40 - 0.60 (weathered)

Why has no propandist ever done their tests on an asphelt road? And why do some even pretend that their choice of surface material has the same albedo as the moon when they know it doesn't?


Ralph Earnest Cascarelli René
24th of August 1933 - 10th of December 2008
http://www.ralphrene.com/
Rest In Peace

http://www.moonmovie.com
http://www.billkaysing.com
http://www.ralphrene.com
http://www.moonhoax.us


Jarrah White would like to invite you to see the Apollo 11 footage that Svector, Phantom Wolf and Shane Killian have tried to suppress from public view.

APOLLO XI: THE LITTLE GEM
http://moonhoax.us/littlegem.htm

See also the evidence of faked and suppressed Apollo 10 footage that Mark Gray doesn't want you to see.

FLAGGING THE GEMS
http://moonhoax.us/flagginggems.htm

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Apollo
• moon
• landing
• hoax
• hoaxed
• shadow
• photography
• fake
• faked
• photos
• Buzz
• Aldrin
• Neil
• Armstrong
• Adam
• Savage
• Jamie
• Hyman
• Mythbusters
• Jay
• Windley
• Phil
• Plait
• Bad
• Astronomy
• Clavius
• space
• spacesuit
• regolith
• albedo
• portland
• cement
• asphelt
• reflectivity
• reflector
• fill
• light
• sun
• exposure
• aperture
• shutter
• speed
• f-stop

[delahaye100]

The quotes from kaysing are so funny..he actually shoots himself in the foot. he says that if there is another ( artificial) light source it should be visible in the visors but isn't. This he takes as proof that there is another ( artificial ) light source. Hohoho!

[WhiteJarrah]

In case you weren't listening, it's concluded that the reflections in the visors were superimposed over the original image.

[zero00tolerance]

You cant go to the moon with a ship made of tin can..and a computer equivalent to a calculator..If Nasa did went to the moon in 1969 then why are they using Russian rocket to go to space now... or having trouble going " back" to the moon in 2012.

[AcronychalRising]

I found it funny how mythbusters photoshopped the photo when they put it up against the other one (the second time the fully showed it) and it had a higher contrast... not joining either side on the debate just noticed that...

[Syphonaptera]

Still frame the clip at 6.12! Here the Myth-buster film-camera is EXACTLY at the opposite of the foto-camera thus should capture the same light intensity as the photocamera. This is the case right? So, then why is the astronauts' model DARK but the same model on the picture of the photo-camera is BRIGHT????

Different exposure times? Why isn't the astronauts'model in this clip at 6.12 (AND 7.20 !) as bright as the picture?? Jarrah is right here??!! I really believe so....

[MrFratet]

Interesting and not trying to doubt you but the video imply that earth is a very bright source f light due to albedo 30 or 40%. Knowing what we can see on earth on full moon would it not be possible that the famous second source of light would be the coming from Earth?

[jamilessdodger1]

excellent video analysis of these cowboy mythbusters, glad i found a vid , thankyou for this jarrah..keep up the good work, how can people really believe we went to the moon in 1969 ...lol

[yappertrap]

i thought they said they added charcoal to the mix to get the proper reading? 6:42 that would lower the albido, would it not?

[Bushtailedwildcat]

Another huge significant point of contradiction resides in the fact that his Portland-cement research features ‘pavement surfaces’ and not powder-cement! Therefore irrelevant.

And due to the fact that the cement-powder it is highly divided will scatter light rather than reflect light like a smooth 'paved' surface.

[Bushtailedwildcat]

One hugely significant point of contradiction to Whitejarrahs criticism regarding the albedo of the mythbusters regolith simulative mixture is that they mixed in charcoal that he fails to take into account; of which has an albedo of almost nothing that will seriously impact the quantity of light reflected.