Uploader Comments (Rangefindergeneral)
Highest Rated Comments
-
Photography is all about observation and imagination if you have this, you have the talent.
-
Digital will not replace large format for many years, if at all. The aesthetic of film can not be achieved on digital. Furthermore digital prints do not last nearly as long as archival silver. It's metal not ink my friend. You do not know what your are talking about.
Video Responses
All Comments (34)
-
@maxpin63 Digital is a waste of time!?!?!? Are yo mad? There's nothing wrong with film, it's beutiful. But to say "digital is a waste of time????"
Go home and listen to Creedence in your 4 track......
-
@Cryocaustic Unfortunately the new K-3 pigment inks on archival paper are estimated to have an archival life of 300 years, much longer than even the best quality fiber papers. Museums are starting to move that direction with new work.
-
@mrahonod you could print the image digitally (lightjet, inkjet, etc) and take a photograph of the print, essentially doing copy art
-
what a down to earth kind of guy
-
One of the best!!.
-
im sure u dont have a glass plate negative
-
I wish I could post a black and white pic I took last week in the Arizona desert.
I bet if I posted it as an Ansel Adams picture, nobody would know it wasn't.
Viva Montaigne!
Put it on flickr and people will look and tell you if its Adams like.
Anyone know how to get a jpeg onto a glass plate negative?
I get it. :-)
but if you really wanted to do it the way I would is with a A/V projector.
For all Photoshop junkies:
Try it with film.... then you will see if you are a photographer or not.
Digital is a waste of time. Try to catch the light through a lens,upon film and bring the light back in the darkroom.
Adams, was fascinated by the future of photography and if he had lived longer would be snapping away with 0s & 1s.
He would also still be using 10x8 film too.