Debunking Global Warming: Satellite and Weather Balloons Evidence

This video discusses the evidence brought forth by Satellite and Weather Balloons that show that the earth is cooling rather than warming.
This video contains edited and enhanced extracts of a presentation given at Stanford University on February 4th, 2010 by Stephen Schneider, professor of biology at Stanford and senior fellow at the Woods Institute for the Environment.

See the entire presentation here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmlHbt5jja4

Additional great information: See greenman3610s excellent channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/greenman3610

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Climate
• change
• debate
• thermometer
• global
• warming
• Anthropogenic
• CO2
• carbon
• dioxide
• climate
• science
• Deniers
• Denial
• Denier
• environment
• atmosphere
• media
• Satellite
• Weather
• Balloons
• Evidence
• NASA
• Climategate
• crock
• of
• the
• week
• greenman3610
• Stephen
• Schneider
• Stanford
• Joniversity

[HomoCyborgZombie]

Global warming denialism belongs in the fiction section of the library.

[Joniversity]

@HomoCyborgZombie Couldn't have said it better myself.

[HomoCyborgZombie]

@Joniversity Then why did you call this "Debunking Global warming" if you agree that those whom deny global warming and humans being a main cause, are a crock of shit?

[Joniversity]

@HomoCyborgZombie Because i figured - why preach to the quire... so i gave it a name that will lure in deniers (don't you know who Stephen Schneider is??? he's the man who coined the term AGW)

Regarding the *main cause* - there is still some controversy about that issue, first of all what does main mean? (50%, 60%, 80%?) also can it be a constant percentage when you take the varying environmental contributions to the warming. But one thing is for sure - humans aren't helping.

[ComicPenius]

Catastrophic global warming cannot be falsified. How convenient.



[MsMrNoface]

Great upload! This is a really complex issue with serious ramifications. It's a shame some people have politicized it to the extent that they have.

[HomoCyborgZombie]

@HomoCyborgZombie Here's a quick reason why:

In Canada, two doctors. Both have the same degree. One passes on the first shot, 100%. The other, five times tried, last time passed, but on 50%. Both now have the same degree. Do you judge on authority, purely by their name, and their credentials? Technically, they have the same.

But digging more, you'll find the other one is... less.

This type of shit happens a lot I hear. Don't quote me on it though.

[HomoCyborgZombie]

@Joniversity Ah, trolling.

I'll be honest and say I don't know David.

I try to stay away from too many faces.

It keeps me more on the merits of their arguments and not the authority.

For example, the quote by Einstein about common sense I agreed with before I knew it was Einstein who said it. This way, I eliminate just agreeing with somebody purely for their academics.

Also, it's Choir ;P

[radoa1]

@Loathomar - mistake ay?? What else have you said is a mistake?? Repeat - Why is there conflict and where has this been raised in the scientifc community. Are you familiar with ACMCA and GPR and what other findings are you specifically talking about?

[Loathomar]

@radoa1 sry that was a mistake, it should be sea level.