Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

RELIGIOUS-REICH SPREADING COMPLETE LIES

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,783
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 9, 2009

Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow on Fox News Climate Change Deniers. Rush Limbaugh tries his hand at conspiracy theory, but can't keep his lies logically straight (1) Murdoch's new puppet WSJ Op-Ed equates Climate Change scientists to Stalinists (2) Fox doctors a Rasmussen Poll (3) Inhofe thinks it's getting colder and that America agrees with him despite the fact neither are actually true.

  • likes, 12 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ObamaComma)

  • There is no conclusive evidence that there is global warming because the global climate system is too large, too complex, and involves time frames in the billions of years for which there is no data. Furthermore, there is no evidence that if there is a slight warming trend now that humans are the cause of it. Global warming is not a serious issue. The earth will still be here long after we humans are gone.

  • @ALTERED13TH - Yeah isn't that amazing, how those stupid scientist have everyone believing that Global Warming is a scientific fact, and cigerettes really are not good for ya? Rediculous isn't it. Rush Limbaugh, now there's the picture of wisdom and health if there ever was one, and his extensive quality higher education at an esteemed university with solid academic credentials, makes his well balanced opinions on all things scientific and political, highly credible and qualified. (Not)

  • "Hide the decline" The real lie in that quote isn't the word "hide"

    The lie was the word "Decline"

    In actuality it was a complete divergence from the real temperatures compared to their proxy data.

    When your stats tanks south and the computer stats flys North, that's called a Colossal f@uk UP!

    The proxy data developed to erase GW in the past has become useless now that a lagitimate warming pirod has returned and declined in the past 5 years.

    It's not that complicated.

  • Well there ya go, that explains the phoney giant icebergs breaking away from antartica and melting away so fast that at the current rate in 10 years the polar cap ice will gone. Those icebergs are really made of styrofoam and spray plastic snow, who would have thought. They look so real?

  • Not to mention the consensus of all the scientists on earth? Are really not as smart as James Inhofe and Rush Limbaugh. Amazing. Maybe next time one of your family members need heart surgery, you should let Rush Limbaugh tell your doctor what to do, since he understands science so much better than the entire consensus of the earth's science. Arrogance and ignorance are a deadly combination.

Top Comments

  • popular aint right, right aint popular

  • Al Gore was the first public figure to say that there have been climate changes of this sort even before the one in Medieval times that republicans kept going on about. (Guess he got into your head too!) Simply put the climate does go through NATURAL climate changes and it is possible that this current one may be a natural occurrence, BUT this one is far worse than the all of the previous known climate changes combined. The Theory is that we are making it worse not that we are causing it. PWND!

see all

All Comments (83)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @ObamaComma There are many respected scientists who dispute the models used to make the claim of global warming. Furthermore, the earth has experienced ice ages and incredible warming periods long before man was here. To allocate resources to trying to stop global warming is foolish. I am all for environmentalism. Let's get idot suburbanites out of their ugly, culturally vacuous suburbs where they drive everywhere in SUV's and destroy our land for roads.

  • global warming if a freakin hoax. period.

  • Lol at at 6:47.

    Too fast for Conservatives, though.

    However, I think there is a factual error. It would be 5th hottest among 139 years where the temperature was surveyed.

  • Lol at at 6:47.

    Too fast for Conservatives, though.

  • I should point out that in the second case of spouting bullshit I referred to you weren't lying, you were merely showing off your ignorance for the whole world to see.

    ALSO: While I have asked you to cite sources in almost every post, I have done more than simply cry "cite your sources" like when I crushed your argument about solar variation or about temperature changes in the last decade. Either offer proof for your arguments or stick your tail between your legs and run home.

  • Sorry, wrong again! I'm male and you are an idiot.

    You have not yet once cited your sources. You spouted total bullshit as your first supporting fact, then your listed more "facts." I pointed out that your fsf was total bullshit and I gave collaborating data. Given that your fsf was an out right lie, I refused to chase down the other other until you told where you got them. You still haven't, instead you spouted more bullshit and were put down for it.

  • simply crying "what are your sources" after i have cited several does you no justice

    you are a silly, silly girl

  • Is that because I just completely crushed your pathetic attempt at an argument?

    Face it, your were debating with a more intelligent and better informed opponent. You should have just quit 4 days ago when I asked you to cite your sources.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more