Evolution - A bundle of lies

Evolution - A bundle of lies with not proof and with time as its only leg to stand on.

A Theodore Shoebat Production

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• evolution
• darwin
• darwinism
• lies
• satan
• false
• creation
• God
• Jesus
• Christ
• Bible
• faith
• freedom
• speech
• new
• york
• times
• aliens
• atheism
• richard
• dawkins

[RuleofFive]

So we're to believe the world is 6000 years old? That (2) people inbred and are responsible for the 6.5 billion people currently on planet earth with all the mutations? How does that explain the thousands of pieces of fossilized evidence to the contrary? There are limits to potassium argon dating that every responsible scientific website explains clearly. I put my faith in provable science rather than fairy tales.

[MomoTheBellyDancer]

@Ultramediacorp

"I don't give a rats ass what evolution doesn't deal in"

If you're so willfully ignorant about a subject, why should anybody take your opinion about it seriously?

[types10000]

@types10000

2).

Additionally we can use comparative anatomy to identify the relatedness between fossil populations and their extant ancestors in the same manner we do living organisms

eg. if we had fossils of a wolf we could identify it was related to dogs using only it's preserved anatomy equally as well.

[types10000]

@Ultramediacorp

" IT IS ALL EVIDENCE THE GOD YOU SAY ISN'T THERE IS RIGHT INFRONT OF YOUR FACE DUMB ASS"

- incorrect, you have failed to provide any evidence that indicates a god, all you point to is things science hasnt explained (which is not evidence of a god and is correctly labelled as an unknown)

'i dont know how this could have happened therefore a magic man must be responsible' is an argument from ignorance logical fallacy

[types10000]

@Ultramediacorp

" That's because I am not interested in how it "Could have" occurred and there is no way in hell anyone will ever know how it occured billions of years ago ya jack ass"

- incorrect, demonstrating how it can happen under unguided naturalistic circumstances indicative of an early earth is evidence it did happen via unguided naturalistic circumstances on an early earth, your a little fuzzy on logic arnt you lol

[moonearthrise]

If you dont know crap about natural sciences, chemistry, biology, geology, biochemistry, have no formal education in sciences, have not spent years reading, learning, and understaning how science and the scientific method works, why comment on a evolution theory based on Biochemistry, Genetics, etc, etc..... if you know nothing about the topic, leave it to profesionals !

[moonearthrise]

@Ultramediacorp if the DNA changes the genetic code has changed and the is Evolution at work, Diferent DNA diferent Species ! you yourself are proving evolution !

[moonearthrise]

@moonearthrise furthermore Darwins Theory of Evolution and Natural Selection does not state how and where the first intelegent self replicating DNA molecule or genetic code of life originated, only how it changed once it appeared.

[moonearthrise]

@Ultramediacorp the genetic code or DNA of bacteria mutate constantly, some changes increase the bacterias posibilities of survival, this is Darwins Natural Selection at work. Survival of the fittist, what studies do you have in Biochemistry, to put down my comment, What i statye you can find in University Biochemistry Text Books like Stryer, or Leninger ! DNA evolves constantly, this is how bacteria become risistent to antbiotics,

[Ultramediacorp]

@types10000 Dude YOU CAN'T EVEN PROVE THAT FOSSIL HAD ANY OFFSPRING MUCH LESS EVOLVED !