Mauro Giuliani Opus 48 No.5
Uploader Comments (waltsguitar)
All Comments (21)
-
This İs İncredible And Magical...
-
Not sure why everyone seems to think it should be played slowly...on the score the tempo marking is Allegro...which is conventially 120 bpm. Playing sextuplets, this is outrageously fast and requires great skill to play clearly, articulating each note. So actually, I think this is a very good performance of it!
-
@waltsguitar Its good excersise, but i love it abit slower, it must be fast, but still not that fast ;) it sounds a bit too chaotic. I like it anyway, it takes many years to get such skill.
-
@markey628 Tempo in any piece can vary from performance to performance. It's as much an expressive device as it is a compositional one.
-
@waltsguitar I love that you don't freak out when someone posts something that isn't appraisal. Personally, I thought you did a great job. Awesome technique and very impressive tempo.
-
I love hearing this piece fast and slow. Fast it sounds chaotic with a motive passion, where as slow, you have much more of an opportunity for high notes, such as the High E arpeggio. Good job!
I've seen it played here on YouTube at a slower tempo and agree, it sounds good slower. I actually play it at various tempos depending on how it strikes me at a given time. For this video I was intentionally trying to see how fast I could take it without totally ruining it.
waltsguitar 3 months ago
sounds good but do you think it needs a ritardando at the end?
peppy6078 1 year ago
@peppy6078 That's just how I happened t play it for this particular video. I'm just happy to have made a half way decent recording of it.
waltsguitar 1 year ago
What is this? F1? To play so fast your articulation shuld be much, much better. In this way the piece is intorelable chaotic.
Zyma2 3 years ago
@Zyma2 Good criticism. Another person told me it was "frenetic".
waltsguitar 1 year ago