Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Rivka Galchen Interview

An interview with Rivka Galchen about her new book Atmospheric Disturbances.  
 
Customize

More From: fifthestateuk

Loading...

QuickList(0)

13 ratings
Sign in to rate
6,267 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (1)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (8)   Options

Loading...
myggggeneration (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
liked the book (listen to books on tape) - gave insights into the intelligent crazy mind. good word smith.
oblomovia (6 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
too many 'likes' for me to consider reading her, where once i really was. are all young american authors such dolts?
emilyhass (9 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
uncanny is an incredibly fitting word to describe this book.
when something familiar becomes unfamiliar it challenges basic assumptions underlying our perceptions of reality. what is familiar is what is known. what happens when you lose that sense of certainty?
atmospheric disturbances is disturbing precisely because it asks this in an incredibly subtle way. beneath skepticism about relationships there is skepticism about the validity of language and knowledge itself.
well done ms. galchen!
wpreston62 (11 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
I can see someone simply not liking the book, but to attribute to it a pretentiousness seems simply not fitting. It's moving and very humane; there's a great deal of personal suffering that the narrator only lets us glimpse. It's a bravura performance, having confidence that readers will stick with a profoundly unreliable narrator in hopes of getting at something like the truth. Marvelous book, but not for everyone, certainly.
nhr215 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -6
Marked as spam
Abrams5983 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I agree that this book was pretty much unreadable. It feels desperate, as if the writer had nothing to say but tried to cover it up. I read the NYT review and I'd say the only thing this author has in common with Kafka is the letter K in their names. To each his own, maybe some people like reading this kind of stuff, but it's not art.
alex57210 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
the book is sort of, like, you know, similar to this, sort of, inarticulate, unfocused and, like, pretentious interview. I tried to read this novel -- the author had a one-sentence idea but didnt know what to do with it. She seems to think fiction is a narcissistic joyride -- look mom, no hands. There is actually a reader at the other end. I finally gave up on p. 100 because I was like, sort of, you know, bored.
renredux1 (1 year ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
An amazing book, an amazing achievement. The feeling of the uncanny, the being in the mystery, is the experience of reading the book. A more rewarding place to be than reality, at least the reality as I daily experience it.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.