Rachel Maddow: Lawrence Wilkerson on the Dangers of Dick Cheney

From The Rachel Maddow Show March 18, 2009.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Rachel
• Maddow
• Show
• Lawrence
• Wilkerson
• Dick
• Cheney

[padmick]

Col. Wilkerson-an exemplary military person and godknows we need more like him in these times, when fear-mongering "creeps its ugly head". Rachel always asks the pertinent questions, too.

[medeak]

What an incredibly brave man to speak out against the evil of Cheney and resigning his post in protest. Richard Clarke and Col Wilkerson are real heros

[im4wur]

source for above:

TESTIMONY OF LEE F. GUNN VICE ADMIRAL, USN (RET.)

HEARING ON "GETTING TO THE TRUTH THROUGH A NONPARTISAN COMMISSION OF INQUIRY"

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SENATE

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY

MARCH 4, 2009

[im4wur]

(cont.) "The stakes are incredibly high. In the balance hangs the ability of the United States to maintain the integrity of our counterterrorism policy; improve intelligence cooperation with allies; support the human intelligence community in employing proven, effective methods for gathering actionable information; and re-establish the moral authority necessary to restore the United States as a world leader in upholding human rights."

[im4wur]

(cont.) "This Congress and the new Administration have a window of opportunity to conduct an examination that signals to the American people and to the world that the policies of the last seven years were an aberration and that the United States is invested in creating an effective, long-term strategy for counterterrorism and intelligence gathering which adheres to American principles and values and to United States and international law." (cont.)

[im4wur]

(cont.) "The Bush Administration's misguided embrace of torture, secret prisons and renditions to torture came at an enormous cost to our American values, our laws, and our counterterrorism efforts. Repairing our reputation as a nation committed to human rights and building a more sustainable framework for national security policy going forward requires a comprehensive examination of the policies and practices that sanctioned torture and abuse." (cont.)

[im4wur]

(cont.) "Did the use of torture spark terrorist recruitment, increase danger to our troops, and damage U.S. leadership and prestige? And did these costs outweigh the benefits? Might actionable intelligence have also been obtained by the non-coercive methods experienced intelligence interrogators experts recommend and employ? What strategic security gains could be reaped from shifting to a policy of complete, consistent and transparent compliance with human rights norms?" (cont.)

[im4wur]

Exceprts from Retired Vice Admiral Lee Gunn's testimomy before Congress:

"An independent commission could undertake the task of examining the facts and, in so doing, weigh the true effectiveness of the Bush administration's torture tactics. Did torture actually uncover actionable intelligence? Did it interrupt plans? And did it actually save lives? If so, what were the countervailing costs to our national security?" - (cont.)

[im4wur]

I wonder how many "terrorists" flawed US policies have created.

[charlie44444]

The "worst of the worst" buzz word for the GOP shot down in flames. Whats sad is that we still seem to want to find proof. Why can't we just assume they are lying and go form there.

[padmick]

An example of an exemplary military person-god knows we need more like him nowadays to elucidate the dangers of fear-mongering. Exceptional video-two really good people...