Silverstein Spills The Beans About WTC Building 7

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
245,111
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 9, 2006

Clip from the Alex Jones and infowars.com movie "Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State". The answer to 9/11 is in building seven. Watch the owner of the WTC say on PBS that they "pulled" the building... and watch a clip from the same PBS special that shows them say "pull it" again to describe control demolition.
"We're getting ready to pull building six."
"We want to be very careful how we demolish building six. This is the undenyable fact. This is what many family members of the victims are asking about. It's time for a real trial and conviction for those who are responsible. Beware men who deny the law of God to lie, steal, and murder for power.

  • likes, 84 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Larry Silverstein DID NOT EVER say " we blew up the building " Alex Jones...typical truther liar

  • Apparently when towers 1 and 2 went down, the debris caused managed damage of the south side of WTC7. Why do truthers never talk about that?

see all

All Comments (5,238)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @GravityMuse "there are many reports asserting that firefighters were never in building 7 on 9/11, so "pulling" the firefighters must not be what silverstein was referring to"

    Sure it was! Who says so? FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro, that's who! Even after 7 was evacuated, FF were on the grounds searching the rubble for survivors & preparing to reenter the building when Chief Nigro's order came down that afternoon.

    Why would he give such an order if there was no one to evacuate?

  • @drummerkid1993 Does it matter? That would never bring a building of that size down.

  • But he did say pull it!! What is the diff!!

  • @orangeblood307 Sorry, but you have no examples of engineers using the term "pull" to refer to using explosives to bring down a building. As a demo term, "pull" refers to the use of cables to literally pull over a structure. It is not used to refer to bringing down a building with explosives.

  • @PoetryHound Pull is 1 of many correct terms... Pull can mean to pull it down, it can mean to blow it down... I've seen countless videos of engineers using the term "pull" right before they bring it down... Who cares though, it was clearly a demolition either way.

  • @TimReed22222 Of course firefighters do not perform demolitions. Why would you even mention that? In fact there are many reports asserting that firefighters were never in building 7 on 9/11, so "pulling" the firefighters must not be what silverstein was referring to. The term/word "pulling" seems to be in hot debate. One can find support on both sides of the fence.

  • @orangeblood307 Actually, in demo industry parlance, "pull" is not a term that refers to using explosives to take down a building. So it turns out you got it wrong. "Pull" is not a correct term.

  • @Appleholic1 Lol, why would he say we blew up the building?? He's not a 5 year old. The correct term is pull.

  • @GravityMuse "Why would he have the authority to give an order like that anyway?"

    Good question. HE DIDN'T. Civilians, even building owners, CANNOT give orders to firefighters. And firefighters do not perform demolitions! So they COULDN'T have been talking about CD.

    "Also, "pulling" is lingo in the building demo trade, no?"

    No, it is not. "We have never once heard the term “pull it” being used to refer to the explosive demolition of a building" - Editor, Structure magazine.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more