michelson-morley dinamic

michelson-morley dinamic

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• michelson
• morley
• movimiento

[CACBCCCU]

The number of wavecycles stays the same on movement through the hypothetical aether, it's a red-shift matching the time dilation. GR put frame-dependence back in to the picture, but if you run inertial frame MM in practically flat space the hypothetical drift presumably, and as shown in this vid, is constant. The upshot of GR seems to be MM's device shows that if there was a drift, light behaves to make a constant drift, and presumably its responsible GR frame, undetectable.

[CACBCCCU]

It's the same thing as tossing a ball back and forth on a moving train, moving faster doesn't slow the air time.

A drift would be like the air of an open car, making the ball veer off sideways, away from where it's aimed. Mirrors and a beamsplitter aren't required to see whether or not in some directions light is veering sideways away from where it's aimed.

[angper]

NEW THEORY OF TIME:  ANGPER

[angper]

I THINK THESE VIDEOS WILL caused a stir in SCIENCE AND THIS IS FOR THE CONTENT that solves many uncertainties that have to date science, IT BECAUSE MY HOBBY IS MAKING ALL THEORIES AND A BOOK TO CONSULT ME WITH RESULT a success of 85% -90% SURE THAT THE SAME HAPPEN NOW, only now not see the answer in any book.

- Antigravity - EXPERIMENT

- ALBERT EINSTEIN & MICHELSON EXPERIMENT

[angper]

I THINK THESE VIDEOS WILL caused a stir in SCIENCE AND THIS IS FOR THE CONTENT that solves many uncertainties that have to date science, IT BECAUSE MY HOBBY IS MAKING ALL THEORIES AND A BOOK TO CONSULT ME WITH RESULT a success of 85% -90% SURE THAT THE SAME HAPPEN NOW, only now not see the answer in any book.

- Antigravity - EXPERIMENT

- ALBERT EINSTEIN & MICHELSON EXPERIMENT

[chuckpcr]

> ActiveStorage

> If one rejects any alternative models that differs from

> one's personal or collective dogmatic beliefs than this

> person is not a scientist

This is not an accurate statement because any alternative model may be rejected for reasons other than dogmatic beliefs or even because they do not explain the data any better than the dogmatic beliefs. This is particularly true when the alternative model interprets the data differently than the dogmatic beliefs do,

[chuckpcr]

First of all this video is just an illustration of the theory behind the michelson-morley experiment. Second the experiment was trying to measure the relative motion between Earth and the ether so it required making no assumptions about ethers absolute motion. They even did the experiment many times over the course of a year to considered possibility that at some point the Earths motion was aligned with that of the ether.

[ActiveStorage]

yes i agree that a single and even multiple observations don't have to prove anything, the more u observe the higher the chance of these observations being able to prove something.

my point was that observation is all we have. we can not prove shit without any observations.

did u hear about the concept of plasma universe? it might explain the pioneer anomalies

[ActiveStorage]

i said personal or collective dogmatic beliefs

collective is a key word there.

[jreniel]

Consider for a moment the Pioneer 10 and 11 anomalies. I'm not going to speculate as to the nature of this anomaly, but surely it is a valid scientific question with an open field for hypothesis. The observations made in the MM experiment and the observations from the Pioneer anomalies are related to each other. Then again, the observations made from the Pioneer anomalies prove nothing. That's the reason why observations are not necessarily proof of anything.