Corruption & Cultural Marxists

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
861 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Aurini)

  • I disagree with the first point made here. If you or your 'group' controls a state and sufficient authority is projected on to you, it would hardly seem rational to continue engaging in productive activity if wealth could be acquired by quicker means.-- I imagine things like cultural norms, weak concentration of power etc. can temper the ambitions of any group controlling government, but only for so long.

  • @Worldslargestipod That would be why I'm an anti-statist. :) But I do believe we have more pressing enemies than Libertarians.

Top Comments

  • The state can be parasitic upon the nation.Don't really want to pay into a system that demographically replaces westerners with Muslims.Why do I want to be altruistic to people who have the most children or despise my values.Kin altruism make more senses to me. there is going to be no reciprocal altruism for giving social power while minorities are being ethnocentric. Especially if the in group I'm from is being set up as the new Jews,the sacrificial lambs to the greater good of equality.

  • @kubaniski Simple; just stretch the definition of 'property' to mean 'that stuff that I deserve because of this self-contradictory moral ideal', and steal to mean 'refusing to part with your property even though I waaaaaant it!'

see all

All Comments (104)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Dumb meathead here! So your saying that Group B is lazy, not wanting to work, and only want to be spoon fed by others so that they can sit around and bitch? Also subbed.

  • Michael Moore's parents were assembly line workers.

    Wat?

  • Just discovered your videos, mate. Subbed.

  • @TehAlexJonesChannel He's just another trite example of Personality Disorder cloaking himself in Ideology.

    A corollary - Stephen Harper may expouse ideology I agree with, but I recognize that he's simply a sociopath, saying whatever he needs to say to stay in power. The man has no true beliefs aside from his own supremecy.

  • @Aurini Breivik was a National Socialist...you agree with some of his ideology....hmmm why call him a piece of garbage then.

  • Great post

  • @doucher337 Maybe... but my view of today's political class are generally high IQ people, in an alternative universe could be very productive. Career politicians were less common in the days of yore simply because the government had less power, less power means fewer ways for politicians to make money, hence, fewer career politicians.

  • @Worldslargestipod

    I think he might be on to something, since with the more productive people you get less rent-seeking and outright banditry than one otherwise sees. When career politicians were a little rarer in the US, for instance, subsidies weren't quite as common, entitlements were nonexistent, and the state was almost unimaginably small compared to today. The state still sucked and abused its power, but a state more along that style would be preferable in almost every way.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more