Crosby OT Goal

Yep it was a goal his stick was underneath the crossbar, therefore it wasn't a high stick.

NO Goal thats is bullshit how refs throw games

lmao you're a joke crosbys a pussy it was def. a high stick nd i bet u like his kicked in goal last night

again stop crying. and he didn't kick it in. and it wasn't a high stick.

So Sidney Crosby gets preferential treatment right? Like they way the NHL wants to suspend him the next game for not participating in all star festivities because he's injured?

Funny thing is, ESPN's bottom line said Daytsuk and Lidstrom are getting suspended for "missing all star festivities and NOT being injured" I guess the NHL is actually stiffening the rules for Cindy

lmao he does...! he doesnt get suspended for punching people in the groin he doesnt get suspended for mugging people off the faceoff crosbys a fucking clown.

sorry they did call it a goal but that was dumb by the ref to call it a goal.

it shouldnt be a goal because that in incunclusive evidence and their was no signal of a goal so it automatically isnt a goal. the only reason it was a goal was because it was sid. No offence to him. he is one of my fave player but he is sidney crosby and i believe that is one of the biggest reasons that they counted that.

Inconclusive of what? You got your rules backwards. The puck was in the net, so therefore there has to be evidence to prove that the puck was hit by a high stick. Not the other way around, as you suggested.

And the goal-light keeper doesn't effect the refs decision just because the light didn't go. That just means that the light keeper thought it wasn't a goal, but it doesn't have an effect on the outcome what so ever.

FYI