4-07 In Search Of... The Shroud of Turin (Part 1 of 2)
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (11)
-
@condorito29 YOu are absolutely correct! The very person who led the original investigation has now confirmed that they DEFINITELY tested a 're-weave' And to the people who said, 'the Catholic Church won't allow it' need to do a little more homework-they've allowed it twice
-
@ztztzyzy Name the Catholic monk.
-
and YOU need to do your homework. what does scripture say? that Jesus was wrapped in linen but on his face was a NAPKIN. also his "visage was marred more than any man" meaning he was unrecognizable. and that the beard was torn from his face. finally NO ONE knows what Jesus looked like as no one did a portrait of him when he was on earth. the image you see today was done by a catholic monk CENTURIES after he left and returned to heaven...those are just a few of the evidences against the shroud
-
@condorito29 yep you are 100% correct. I have seen several Docos on this very issue. It was a "Right Royal" botch job, but at least the truth has come out.
-
Leonard sounds like his batteries are going flat
-
lol fraud
-
About 10 years ago it was found to be a fraud. I wipe my ass with it.
you need to do your homework.
Los Alamos Labs has recently confirmed that the Carbon Dating which supposedly proved the shroud was a fake, was INVALID.
The sample used for the dating came from a portion of the shroud which was expertly rewoven in medieval times in order to repair it.
Newer cotton threads were interwoven with the old linen.
The C-14 dating accurately tested a piece of the shroud that was not representative of the main body of the cloth.
condorito29 2 years ago 3
I've read that the dating of the shround is far too young to be of Jesus, but rather it is the image of one of the Knights Templar.
hunternieuport 1 year ago