please do not think of me like of an wacko, i understand clearly what happend and how it happened, and the reason why government did it, its not a blind believe in a conspiracy without any proof or a investigation, i see the full picture and nothing from it looks supernatural and even no derivation from the law of physics. Your problem is just you dont want to see the truth.
i could talk for hours about 9/11 showing you real facts, how norad didnt react that day, no plane hit the pentagon, the melting steel that was found under the wreck, witnesses talking about hearing explosions after and before the planes, the pancake theory, steel cannot melt because of a fire and keep in mind that this was the first time when a building collapsed because of a fire, some of the hijackers were alive, and so on.
I never mentioned fire; stop making assumptions. Damage from the collapse of a skyscraper adjacent to it and tearing a huge gash in the building _might_ just have compromised the integrity of WTC 7.
Unless of course you live on planet conspiracy; where the laws of physics change at will and all governments are inherantly evil. Change the record already and stop whining about reality not being how you would like it. 9/11 was most definitely not an inside job and the sane have proof. End of.
so you want to say that a simple fire made wtc 7 to collapse?:), besides thermite bombs doesnt inflict much explosion such as simple c4 bombs for a non steel buildings. Well i havent even started to go more detailed in all of this, what i said was only some obvious facts.
Answer me this; if it was 'demolished' the explosives required would have been not only large in volume but would have spread debris including masonry and glass a vast distance. No video out there suggest ANY evidence of explosion or freefall speed.
If you're going to glue yourself mindlessly to a conspiracy, make it one that at least retarded people could believe.
proof? by watching the video of its collapse is enough proof to see that its a controlled demolition, if you noticed it fell with a free fall, like in controlled demolition. Just compare video of its falling with a controlled demolition and you will notice the similaritis:)
Bring me proof that it was a controlled demolition and I shall be more than happy to debunk your theory; evidence of explosive residue, photographic proof etc. PLEASE don't resort to 'eyewitness accounts' as it's no more proof than asking somebody on the street what they think happened.
"please do not think of me like of an wacko, i understand clearly what happend and how it happened, and the reason why government did it"
Yet you offer no evidence to support your 'knowledge'. Odd that.
MCH1984 2 years ago
Thermite won't inflict any explosion you chode; it's an incendiary.
MCH1984 2 years ago
please do not think of me like of an wacko, i understand clearly what happend and how it happened, and the reason why government did it, its not a blind believe in a conspiracy without any proof or a investigation, i see the full picture and nothing from it looks supernatural and even no derivation from the law of physics. Your problem is just you dont want to see the truth.
TheLegacyofKain 2 years ago
i could talk for hours about 9/11 showing you real facts, how norad didnt react that day, no plane hit the pentagon, the melting steel that was found under the wreck, witnesses talking about hearing explosions after and before the planes, the pancake theory, steel cannot melt because of a fire and keep in mind that this was the first time when a building collapsed because of a fire, some of the hijackers were alive, and so on.
TheLegacyofKain 2 years ago
I never mentioned fire; stop making assumptions. Damage from the collapse of a skyscraper adjacent to it and tearing a huge gash in the building _might_ just have compromised the integrity of WTC 7.
Unless of course you live on planet conspiracy; where the laws of physics change at will and all governments are inherantly evil. Change the record already and stop whining about reality not being how you would like it. 9/11 was most definitely not an inside job and the sane have proof. End of.
MCH1984 2 years ago
so you want to say that a simple fire made wtc 7 to collapse?:), besides thermite bombs doesnt inflict much explosion such as simple c4 bombs for a non steel buildings. Well i havent even started to go more detailed in all of this, what i said was only some obvious facts.
TheLegacyofKain 2 years ago
Answer me this; if it was 'demolished' the explosives required would have been not only large in volume but would have spread debris including masonry and glass a vast distance. No video out there suggest ANY evidence of explosion or freefall speed.
If you're going to glue yourself mindlessly to a conspiracy, make it one that at least retarded people could believe.
MCH1984 2 years ago
There is no proof of freefall speed; do you even understand what freefall speed is?
MCH1984 2 years ago
proof? by watching the video of its collapse is enough proof to see that its a controlled demolition, if you noticed it fell with a free fall, like in controlled demolition. Just compare video of its falling with a controlled demolition and you will notice the similaritis:)
TheLegacyofKain 2 years ago
Bring me proof that it was a controlled demolition and I shall be more than happy to debunk your theory; evidence of explosive residue, photographic proof etc. PLEASE don't resort to 'eyewitness accounts' as it's no more proof than asking somebody on the street what they think happened.
MCH1984 2 years ago