The Eye's Computer

GOD OF WONDERS
This brand new 85-minute DVD features Ian Taylor and many other creation science experts...and it includes some of the most breathtaking nature photography you've ever seen! Survey the unimaginable size of the universe and ponder the vast energy present in all matter. Examine the elegant water molecule essentail for all life and discover how God conbines these molecules to form beautiful and symmetical snow crystals. Learn about the incredible complexity of DNA and the miraculous workings of the tiny seed. From the design functionally of birds to the incredible transformation of butterflies, these and many other creatures of creation are highlighted in this visually stunning presentation. http://www.creationmoments.com/catalog/index.php?main_page=product_info&p...

Rave reviews for God of Wonders:

"It is superb and breathtaking...a masterpiece! It brought tears to my eyes as it was so masterfully done and obviously blessed by the hand of God, a real tribute and glory to our Lord Jesus!"

"What an amazing production! I haven't seen a program so comprehensive in covering the details of God's creation. I can't say enough about it."

"It presents a powerful message of just how awesome our God is. It's also a highly relevant video in today's evolution dominated world."

Transcript - http://www.creationmoments.net/radio/transcript.php?
t=1034

"Creation Moments" daily 2 minute radio/broadcast with host Ian Taylor is heard around the world on over 1300 stations and outlets. Each program features scientific evidences of nature that points to delicate design not evolutionary chance. Creation Moments http://www.creationmoments.net 2 minute radio programs - http://www.creationmoments.net/radio/archives.php Business Hours: Mon-Fri: 8:00am to 4:30pm E-mail: info@creationmoments.com Phone & Fax: Toll Free: 1-800-422-4253 Local: 1-320-968-4092 Fax: 320-968-4094
Write us at:
Creation Moments PO Box 839 Foley, MN 56329
Visit our office at: 19365 65th St NE Foley, MN 56329

Hi Dave: You may use images from webvision for any non profit teaching application. Best wishes, Helga Kolb

Helga Kolb
Professor Emeritus Moran Eye Center http://webvision.med.utah.edu/index.html

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• optic
• nerve
• visual
• photosensitive
• ganglion
• cells
• rods
• cones
• Creation
• Moments
• pigment
• binocular
• vision
• color
• outer
• nuclear
• layer
• inner
• plexigorm
• bipolar
• epithelium
• photoreceptors
• plexiform

[RicoRicanNYC]

The truth hurts huh

[ChristianTruthHammer]

If you had the faintest idea about physics you would know the big bang is impossible. Ever heard of the law of conservation of angular momentum? If not, go study it and then explain to me with your superior knowledge how 1 planet spins backwards, and another one sideways. Then explain why at least 8 moons spin the wrong way, not to mention entire galaxies.

If you knew anything about computers you would see how amazing this video really is.

[TheDarkLordLucifer]

Burn the gospel of lunacy, my ritual has begun. Bathe in the darkness, it is Satan's creation. For life eternal in the demon's lodge. Burn the book of lies with flames. Choose the darkened spiraling path. Unholy world of doom and gloom awaits. Breath of demons soon flow. Darkness in your soul for all time. A gathering storm in a shadowy realm. Black clouds boiling in the sky. Signed in the shrine of blood 'n fear. The diabolical temple of hell. Satan's feet mark the ground.

[BatchDrake]

@ChristianTruthHammer Seriously, you can't call the eye a computer. It's a camera. The "calculations" are extremely parallelized: there are about 92 millions of rod cells and 4.5 millions of cone cells, every calculation is performed separately by each cell, and their response is quite slow: they can only perceive flickering under 250 Hz (and being optimistic) . This is not enough to call the human eye a computer. At least not an efficient one. With millions of CPUs I can do the same, better.

[5tonyvvvv]

@mylongsword Homochirality destroys the evolutionists theory of life came from raw chemicals, molecules could have never organized themselves in perfect order and digital code that takes Intelligence! Life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible!

[5tonyvvvv]

@ChristianTruthHammer Homochirality destroys the evolutionists theory of life came from raw chemicals, molecules could have never organized themselves in perfect order and digital code that takes Intelligence! Life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible!

[egokick]

@mylongsword Laugh at reality. Hope it will go away...

Why would you expect to find an entirely complete fossil record? (this expectation illustrates a lack of awareness in the field of archaeology). Here is a "missing link" Australopithecus, care to explain this? Care to invalidate 1000s of independently verifiable pieces of evidence for evolution and explain how the real causes link to a god?

evidence beside the fossil records: watch?v=i1fGkFuHIu0

[mylongsword]

@egokick

Evolution: Long ago in a galaxy far far away... LOL

enjoy your fairy tale

test? lol where are these missing links?

[egokick]

@mylongsword there are literally 1000s of independently verifiable tests done that support the theory of evolution, you may say evolution is incorrect and those tests in fact point to a different theory, however, saying evolution is not real science because it is incorrect, is incorrect, scientists are following the scientific method, if you have found some amazing piece of evidence that disproves all of the previously done tests that supports evolution then please submit it for peer review.

[mylongsword]

@egokick Evolution is not real science.

[egokick]

It could be possible that every conclusion scientists have come up with to date is completely wrong, but this would not "disprove science", as you would have to use science in order to come up with the conclusion that the current theories are wrong. i.e. through testing of theories, you should work to disprove claims, not prove them. it is very easy to fit certain knowledge to make certain claims look good, not so much to subject certain claims to all knowledge.