Keep acting like the jackass flamer you are. You obviously are still paying attention, and obviously you still can't answer on the substance. Which makes you the weakling, idiot.
Re your silliness in referring to the "most interesting man" commercial, of course I'm not claiming to be anything of the sort, and of course it has nothing to with the content of what I said. You're just another dime-a-dozen flamer who loves to get on a comment list and insult people, leave a little Dos Equis bomb to try to induce them not to post again, etc. Who gives a shit?
And I stand by my comment. I'm fine with letting people see who the "boor" is, you worthless flamer. Once again, of course, you have completely avoided anything remotely resembling a substantive response, possibly because even you know that the point of the original comment--which was simply that the announcer was wrong in saying "THIS is the swing they're trying to learn," as opposed to "this is the man who had the swing, etc."--was both correct and defensible.
@emncaity thank you , allow me to retort professor. as i can see you are a sophisticated critic , who finds himself eminently capable of "analyzing" S. Snead's older swing, I stand by my first comment regarding yours as boorish and adding little if nothing to the body of work in our Youtube arena. But hey , you got to see yourself in print again, and I can tell you like that......have a dos xx and feel good knowing you are the world's most interesting man. dork
Yeah, because I'm the only guy out here--somebody who's both taught and played the game for money, no less--who makes comments or does analysis on the golf swings of great players on Youtube. Eejit.
If you have any comments on the actual substance of the matter, feel free to proceed. Like, for instance, if you want to make the case that the swing he had in his 60s (he'd be about 67 or so here) is equally powerful, impressive, and emulatable as the one he had when he was younger.
Announcer cracks me up. This is still a helluva swing, of course--I mean, who else do you know out there, Tiger included, who's going to shoot a 67 in a regular tour event when he's 67 years old, and then follow it up two days later with a 66?--but the "swing they're trying to learn" is more from his earlier years, especially once he got into his 40s or so. Here, he's having to make some compensations for age--not quite the poetry it had been, but still awfully good.
@bicklesby1
Keep acting like the jackass flamer you are. You obviously are still paying attention, and obviously you still can't answer on the substance. Which makes you the weakling, idiot.
emncaity 9 months ago
@emncaity keep typing weakling , I wasn't paying attention. I'm inducing you to post again.
bicklesby1 9 months ago
@bicklesby1
As for Snead himself, nobody is a bigger fan of his than I am. You may now piss off, or post another insubstantial retort. Makes no difference to me.
emncaity 10 months ago
@bicklesby1
Re your silliness in referring to the "most interesting man" commercial, of course I'm not claiming to be anything of the sort, and of course it has nothing to with the content of what I said. You're just another dime-a-dozen flamer who loves to get on a comment list and insult people, leave a little Dos Equis bomb to try to induce them not to post again, etc. Who gives a shit?
emncaity 10 months ago
And I stand by my comment. I'm fine with letting people see who the "boor" is, you worthless flamer. Once again, of course, you have completely avoided anything remotely resembling a substantive response, possibly because even you know that the point of the original comment--which was simply that the announcer was wrong in saying "THIS is the swing they're trying to learn," as opposed to "this is the man who had the swing, etc."--was both correct and defensible.
emncaity 10 months ago
@emncaity thank you , allow me to retort professor. as i can see you are a sophisticated critic , who finds himself eminently capable of "analyzing" S. Snead's older swing, I stand by my first comment regarding yours as boorish and adding little if nothing to the body of work in our Youtube arena. But hey , you got to see yourself in print again, and I can tell you like that......have a dos xx and feel good knowing you are the world's most interesting man. dork
bicklesby1 10 months ago
@bicklesby1
Yeah, because I'm the only guy out here--somebody who's both taught and played the game for money, no less--who makes comments or does analysis on the golf swings of great players on Youtube. Eejit.
If you have any comments on the actual substance of the matter, feel free to proceed. Like, for instance, if you want to make the case that the swing he had in his 60s (he'd be about 67 or so here) is equally powerful, impressive, and emulatable as the one he had when he was younger.
emncaity 10 months ago
@emncaity if the slammer was still around im sure he would be proud to know you approve. dork
bicklesby1 10 months ago
Announcer cracks me up. This is still a helluva swing, of course--I mean, who else do you know out there, Tiger included, who's going to shoot a 67 in a regular tour event when he's 67 years old, and then follow it up two days later with a 66?--but the "swing they're trying to learn" is more from his earlier years, especially once he got into his 40s or so. Here, he's having to make some compensations for age--not quite the poetry it had been, but still awfully good.
emncaity 3 years ago