Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

CLIP0002.AVI

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
81 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 30, 2010

We in America are overtaxed. Why is the fair tax a better plan? A volunteer with the Fair Tax talks to the DebtFree45ever.Net's camera.

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ThriftyPrince)

  • 90% really? You need to get some facts. Take a look at Texas, there is no income tax, local, county and state taxes combined do not exceed 9%. Not to mention food (groceries) is tax free. There are several states that are consumption tax based rather then income. Eight states in fact.

  • Thrifty 90% comes from a little thing called MATH.

    If you have a federal sales tax to replace all other fed tax -- it has to be 90%, not 23. The 23% is pure bullshit and they know it. They got the 23% by pretending to tax things they know is absurd. They won't --- can not -- get enough money by 23%.

    But they told you dumb fucks that, and you are too stupid to question it.

    FT knows their own plan is horse shit, which is why they arent trying to pass it.

  • faulty math. to say a sales tax that replaces income tax would be 90%, would be saying that income tax was 90%. Fact is NO one pays 90% in income tax.

    Meaning that would be the same for a national sales tax to replace said income tax.

    I support a national sales tax. Which would eliminate the IRS (and yes 1000's of government jobs). Thus saving billions of dollars every year.

    The savings would be applied to other government functions.

see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What did this cute chick do to learn about FT? Skim thru the "book" ? Did she read where the GOVERNMENT would be the highest taxpayer

    Did she not bat an eye at that craziness?

    Did she read where all medical spending will be taxed -- including nursing home care, cancer treatments, etc>

    Does she have any fucking idea what will happen if you put the highest sale tax on earth on food, rent, medicl cost? Does she really think some people wont demand exemptions?

    Does she think at all?

  • A federal sales tax to replace all other taxes would be 90% -- according to real studies.

    FT says it would be 23%, but they know that's only if you count absurdity upon absurdity.

    That's ONLY if you actually can create money by taxing every city and state - AND if the cities and states pay.

    Thats ONLY if you actually can tax rent, medical care, food, car insurnce, utiliies, with the HIGHEST tax on earth, no exceptions.

    So FT is based on layer after layer of absuridty. It's BS.

  • Thrifty -- wrong. Keep in mind, 23% is based on actually GETTING 23% of all new home sales - as taxe revenue. . 23% of all health care cost -- as tax revenue.  23% of all government spending -- as tax revenue.

    Guess what dumb fuck - that income is impossible to collect, it won't be there, retard. Therefore 23% is bullshit.

    Real studies show 90% -- based on what you could actually tax.

    Keep in mind dumb fuck - FT leaders know their own plan is bulshit. It's a farce DF

  • What if I told you I could have a national sales that will make prices will drop so much --the added tax won't matter? That's FT.

    What if I told you I will make the math for this amazing plan "works" because I will tax moonbeams and frog songs?

    Because that's pretty much what FT is offering. They claim they will tax the government -- they may as well tax moonbeams and frog songs.

    Here is a clue -- FT leaders KNOW their math is insane nonsene. Its not real plan.

  • The 23% FT claims comes from a deliberate lie that they will just tax the government for most of government income.

    Got that? This has nothing to do with some states having a sales tax. Have all the sales taxes you want - - but 23% won't be near enough to replace all federal taxes. It will be more like 90%. Got that? This is a math issue.

    Let me repeat - the 23% is based on lunacy and deception - of pretending to tax government. Do you grasp that yet?

    It wont be 23%

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more