young earth evidence 6B of 6

part of a series i recomend you watch. the hole thing from the start. you will get the evidence you need to decide young bible earth or old billion year earth

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• science
• archeology
• bible
• jesus
• islam
• evolution
• creation

[lawilson200]

Where YECers fail, they do not look beyond the edge of their nose. You simply cannot look at a single event (like the eruption of Mount St Helens) and then assert something larger then it really was. If you want to prove a flood, then you must find evidence around the world, not just one location. The eruption of MSH happened 28 years ago. Surely, there are other areas YECers can look. Like the Indian Ocean Tsunami. Interesting that I see little in the YEC websites on that event.

[ninnzbinnz]

@lawilson200 this is in a forest situation and layering is required none of which can be compared to a tsunami. it simply outline the possibility beyond shadow of a doubt that it can happen fast, and he compares it to another similar are. which scientists claim it is millions of years worth of layering due to there pigheaded standpoint.

[gregrutz]

@ninnzbinnz No one ever said layers can not happen quickly. People miss represent uniformitarianism, thinking it means slow and gradual and uniform. It just says the >processes< are the same, volcanos today same as yesterday.

Floods now just like in the past. Six great mass extinctions in the past.

Proving something happens fast does not prove the 44 distinct layers in the Grand Canyon did not take a long time to be laid down and then raised up to 8000 ft.ASL

[lawilson200]

@ninnzbinnz - Now that I had a chance to rewatch this video, what first comes to mind is just how badly Veith described the eruption of MSH. I did recognize where he picked up his argument, it is almost verbatium from ICR's videos. The USGS have a large number of publications online on MSH, he would be better off consulting them. The most recent Journal of the Geological Society (of London) has a fascinating review of Pennsylvanian upright trees in the US.. You should read it.

[lawilson200]

@ninnzbinnz - I do love revisiting old postings. My question is, why are you revisiting this old posting? Do you think anything has changed in the three years since we last exchanged barbs? I have noticed that you have not learned anything. We live on a dynamic planet. Some processes are gradual. Other processes occur catastrophically. There is nothing pigheaded about it.

[magick205]

@MrNewlife888: Excellent arguments? True. All coming from gregrutz, lawilson2000, and voiceoftruth2006. This Vietz guy? I wouldn't let him take out my trash.

[MrNewlife888]

Excellent arguments in this series. Thanks for posting.

[gregrutz]

"coal pits we deem to be millions of years old in places that are high up above sea level"

How many years does it take to grow trees and then bury them deep enough to make coal and then raise the whole area high above sea level.

I would just guess it takes millions of years.

[lawilson200]

What? You do not know me at all. Talk about making assumptions! Look in a mirror sometime!

[lawilson200]

Now this is the most nonsensical argument I have seen yet and it certainly shows you have no understanding of what is being advanced by your fellow YECers.

If you really want to be treated seriously, then your side needs to develop a model that is predictable and it confrom to neighboring regions. On this ground your argument fails.

[lawilson200]

Then why bother?