Human versus Computer-Generated Astrology Reading

Is Computer-Generated Astrological Reading reliable as readings from human live reader? There is a misconception people think that the Computer-Generated Reading is not as valid as the readings from a human astrologer. It is wrong to say that the Computer-Generated Reading is not going to be accurate. Ever since I have started AstroVed, I have looked into this problem. But in my opinion, the Computer-Generated Reading is far more reliable than most human astrologers. Not that I am putting down the ability of human astrologers, live astrologers. But I want to look at what really goes into the reading part and both of them, the human astrologer versus computer are dealing with data, how they are able to analyze the data and present the reading.

As far as Vedic astrology is concerned, it is a science. The Supreme Court of India has upheld it in the parliament of India has upheld that it is a science. University Grants Commission is now giving grants to colleges and universities to start Vedic astrology departments. I myself have invested in working on the project to develop a Vedic astrological university that is going to study astrology as a science. So speaking from that perspective, I am confident to present to you my finding; the finding is, the Computer-Generated Readings are better than human readings. However, I must exercise a caution here that not that all Computer-Generated Reading are uniformly better, in the same way not that all the human live readers are bad, there are extremely good astrologers and computers are not as good as they are. But then such astrologers are very very rare and they are pricey or expensive to ordinary people to approach. But for all practical purposes, if we view for instance, AsroVed's Computer-Generated Predictions with any other predictions, you will find that the AstroVed's is better because, we have used a lot of data and compared them before we put put them into the proper format to give a reading.

So, our logic is better. Our logic is not only better, but it is more involved and from my own random checking of the reading from AstroVed's Computer-Generated Readings, I have found that they are 80 percent correct reading. So, our logic here is superior and I hope that people who have some knowledge of computer will know, what do I mean by saying that this Computer-Generated Reading versus the human reading and what is the value of it. You can test for yourself. And so, it is certainly a misconception to put down the Computer-Generated Reading as something very mechanical and not truthful. It is a science and I am very happy that we have developed this program, so that we can make it available to the mass. One of those AstroVed's goal is to make astrology very inexpensive so that you can know your own predictions. You don't have to go to an astrologer; you can get all the readings just through logging in and checking out. I am going to do more innovations in that and I am very excited in developing such precise readings for the masses.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Human
• versus
• Computer-Generated
• Astrology
• Reading