Differences threaten Gaza reconstruction - 02 Mar 09
Top Comments
All Comments (53)
-
Israel terrorists don't have the right to blockade thousands of people without food nor water from the first place !
Israel terrorists must open the crossing !
-
Incendiary weapons are not exactly a complex military technology. A piece of wood burning at one end is an incendiary weapon. Entire villages have been torched using nothing more than cigarette lighters. Even Napalm is just a jelled form of gasoline (aka petrol).
The Chinese first discovered how to make gunpowder. And (to their great credit, IMHO) the first impulse of these Chinese was to use gunpowder in public fireworks displays, for visual delight - and not to create more lethal weapons.
-
Just because something is forbidden doesn't mean people will not do it. It's forbidden to lie in christianity but everyone does it. It's forbidden to drink alcohol in Islam must of the middleeast drinks beer and alcoholic beverages anyways.
-
Well lets see here by around 837 muslim armies were known for their fire archers known as naffatin, then there was mamluk sultanate who used nafata against cyprus. Then in the 12 century muslims in syria were using clay and glass grenades for fire weapons. It's has also been argued arabs/muslims developed the worlds first real gun, arabs had access to gun powder before europeans did.
-
do you have proof? how can that be so about muslims when it is forbidden for us to kill people by fire. And historically europe has been more military and more advanced in developing weapons. even before the first world wars, look at european history and how bloody it was and colonialism by the spanish, british, french etc. the natives they encountered almost could never match them in weaponry
-
Just too let you know dude the chinese and muslims were the first ones too develop incendiary weapons, europeans developed them later.
-
Am I complaining about the way how palestinians are reacting? It wasn't your opinion they should be considered a wmd you said they were in that in your opinion they were wmd. If I had a choice I would choose bullet but then again tracer bullet can start fires and can burn you anyways, when your hit by a bullet they are hot as hell and will burn you. Every region of the world has given special attention to the field of weapon that are incendiaries.
-
that was neven my claim. i meant that in my opinion white phosphorous should be considered a wmd, but this argument is fruitless. the point is that killing over 1000 civilians is wrong, even if they werent all civilians. who cares what weapons they used. actually would u prefer being burned to death or shot with a bullet? in islam its forbidden to burn people. its a horrible way to die. i was merely commenting on the special attention the west has given to the field of weaponry
-
well thats what israel and the US do to them so they want to get back in kind using the means availiable to them, that is improvising. of coarse that doesnt make it right, in islam its forbidden to kill civilians no matter what, but can anyone be surprised that palestinians react that way after all the dehumanation and persecution?
-
improvise by killing innocents?
zionist puppet reunion: sarkozy, mubarak, abbas, clinton
ywcskg 3 years ago 3
Israel needs to pay for its damage.
lingxyu 3 years ago 3