part 2 Jehovah`s witnesses and the 1914 invisable presence of Jesus
Loading...
Loading...
235
views
Loading...
Uploader Comments (arnie365)
Video Responses
This video is a response to Jehovah`s witnesses and the 1914 invisable presence of Jesus.
Loading...
7:28
Testimonies about 1975 from people who were Jehovah's Witnesses during the timeby utukkuxul6,299 views- 10:02
The origins of the Michael the Archangel as Jesus belief part 1by utukkuxul11,099 views
- 6:18
Tribute to Michael Jackson Part 5 of 6by ThePresentTruth1,756 views
- 10:06
The origins of the Michael the Archangel as Jesus belief part 2by utukkuxul4,736 views
- 7:14
1914: Jehovah's Witnesses Proudly Proclaim when Jesus became Kingby JWMediaFilms10,352 views
- 1:14
Pastor Russell - Death & Resurrection of Jesus (1914).mpgby TheocraticResearch2,418 views
- 7:41
Jerusalem's Destruction: 607 BCE or 587 BCE? Jehovah's Witnesses Discussby JWMediaFilms12,619 views
- 6:53
Watchtower Comments 2/15/08by NewJerusalem1979325 views
- 3:09
Portion of Talk in District Convention "Keep On the Watch" - Jehovah's witness Elderby sweetmikser11,905 views
- 6:50
Re: Jehovah's Witness Question- 01by browny0383 views
- 5:37
1975 -What the Watchtower doesn't want you to knowby JWMediaFilms49,925 views
- 5:07
Jehovah's Witnesses and the Pagan Origin of 1914by WhereIsTruth32,164 views
- 7:05
Re: Jehovah's Witness Question- 01by browny0194 views
- 3:18
More signs you might be a Jehovah's Witnessby utukkuxul3,376 views
- 10:00
Creepy Jehovah's Witness Conventionby PolsciStudent44,304 views
- 5:05
Jehovah's Witnesses and 1914 (part 2)by MrKattt2,217 views
- 2:24
Manuscript talk on the subject of "Time" - Jehovah's witness Elder- District Conventionby sweetmikser3,200 views
- 10:00
WNFJ2008 - Christy #5by WNFJ20082,162 views
- 4:32
Did Jesus' Invisible Presence begin in 1914?by Bibl3Thumper297 views
- 0:08
W T S_1_5_chunk_100.aviby qwn39094144 views
Okay, give me the references.....
So what about the other people who view this? You can't shew them off too! Just re do it, you'll get your views right back. I just think people really need to know this information. But oh well!
rootboysupreme1 2 years ago
i agree with u i must redo it,it`s just i have limited time at the moment.
arnie365 2 years ago
I'm sorry but this video is so unclear as far as the message goes! Not to mention the video quality. But as far as the 539 A.D. and 1914...., WHAT IS THE POINT HERE? Maybe you should write what you want to say down first before recording and posting!!! Don't think that I am bashing you or anything like that, because I talk to JW's as well about 1914, but what I am saying is... Be clear in your video, and be clear in what you say.
rootboysupreme1 2 years ago
sorry about the video quality bt it will make sense if u watch part 1.
the point is 1914 is invalid cos the wts has no base 4 their 606 destruction of jerusalem date cos the real date ,587 was derived the same way 539 was .the jw`s accept 539 as valid bt reject 587 cos it soes`nt fit their lie that Jesus came back in 1914 which was derived from pagan pyramidology.
arnie365 2 years ago
Why are you showing a page that people can't see?
rootboysupreme1 2 years ago
i loaded it up wrong,u can look up the references i give urself.
arnie365 2 years ago