Once again I dissect the 'scientific dissent from darwin' produced by the creationist propoganda mill known as the discovery institute. I also examine where this culture of scientific denial came from, and how it relates to conservative thinktanks and big tobacco.
@TheZooCrew Don't tell me to cite my source, especially when you didn't cite any of the crap you're spewing. Cite your sources then complain about others not doing the same. IOW: lead by example
The same logic that claims vegetarians are evil because Hitler was a vegetarian. DonExodus2 is a two-faced hypocrite and a liar. May he and his AGW cultist buddies at the IPCC be exposed for the lying frauds that they are.
DonExodus2's faith in AGW isn't shaken when scientists sue the IPCC to force them to remove their names from the IPCC reports. DonExodus2 then outright lies and claims conservatives denied the effects of smoking. Most conservative arguments against smoking bans are based on individual freedom even if the person is doing something that adversely affect their health. All of this is done solely to invoke the sleazy tactic of guilt by association.
DonExodus2 complains that the material released by the Discovery Institute either reference individuals who were not experts in the field of science covered in the material and that the few actual authorities in biology references had their names published against their will and knowledge. Yet DonExodus2 doesn't bat an eye when the IPCC does the exact same dishonest tactics. No mention that much of the 'scientific' literature in the IPCC reports were produced by environmental advocacy groups.
@CrossoverManiac
= The same logic that claims vegetarians are evil because Hitler was a vegetarian. =
Well, I'm glad we all agree on that! :)
mphello 3 months ago
@CrossoverManiac
[skepticalscience(dot)com(slash)global(dash)warming(dash)scientific(dash)consensus(dot)htm]
[reuters(dot)com(slash)article(slash)2010(slash)11(slash)26(slash)us(dash)smoking(dash)passive(dash)deaths(dash)idUSTRE6AP00D20101126]
[selections(dot)rockefeller(dot)edu(slash)cms(slash)science(dash)and(dash)society(slash)frederick(dash)seitz(dot)html]
TheZooCrew 4 months ago
@TheZooCrew Don't tell me to cite my source, especially when you didn't cite any of the crap you're spewing. Cite your sources then complain about others not doing the same. IOW: lead by example
CrossoverManiac 4 months ago
@CrossoverManiac
"DonExodus2 then outright lies and claims conservatives denied the effects of smoking."
He has documents to back him up, dick.
"when scientists sue the IPCC to force them to remove their names from the IPCC reports."
Citation? Also, 97% of climatologists accept AGW, so it's not the same situation.
TheZooCrew 4 months ago
The same logic that claims vegetarians are evil because Hitler was a vegetarian. DonExodus2 is a two-faced hypocrite and a liar. May he and his AGW cultist buddies at the IPCC be exposed for the lying frauds that they are.
CrossoverManiac 4 months ago
DonExodus2's faith in AGW isn't shaken when scientists sue the IPCC to force them to remove their names from the IPCC reports. DonExodus2 then outright lies and claims conservatives denied the effects of smoking. Most conservative arguments against smoking bans are based on individual freedom even if the person is doing something that adversely affect their health. All of this is done solely to invoke the sleazy tactic of guilt by association.
CrossoverManiac 4 months ago
DonExodus2 complains that the material released by the Discovery Institute either reference individuals who were not experts in the field of science covered in the material and that the few actual authorities in biology references had their names published against their will and knowledge. Yet DonExodus2 doesn't bat an eye when the IPCC does the exact same dishonest tactics. No mention that much of the 'scientific' literature in the IPCC reports were produced by environmental advocacy groups.
CrossoverManiac 4 months ago