Hide The Decline II - The Sequel

This is a sequel to the popular 'Hide the Decline' spoof video poking fun at Dr. Michael Mann, a prominent scientist involved in the Climategate scandal.

After Dr. Mann threatened to sue the producers of the original video, a new version of the video was produced by the No Cap and Trade Coalition.

You can read more about the controversy involving Dr. Michael Mann at NoCapAndTrade.com. Be sure to sign the petition while you are there.

If you would like to donate to the legal defense fund, visit www.M4GW.com.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• song
• parody
• satire
• Minnesotans for Global Warming
• PSU
• IPCC
• CRU
• global warming
• climate change
• funny
• humorous
• M4GW
• No Cap and Trade
• NCAT

[m1aws]

@TurboDally Have a look on the "woodfortrees" website. choose any data, (apart from GISS which is run by IPCC's Hansen). Hadcrut global is best. Then set to the last decade. 2001. If you open a fresh series for "linear trend ols" over the start date you will see it slopes down.

Over the past couple of lifetimes, the Sun has been overactive. We might see up to a couple of decades of cooling weather now. Arctic sea ice is back to normal. Sea levels are dropping. The mesosphere is collapsing etc.

[m1aws]

@RedXlV You are snatching at straws if you are referring to the very early Earth before higher order life forms. Through irrelevance, I do not.

[RedXlV]

@m1aws

What the hell kind of made-up theory are you talking about?

It's indisputable that for most of Earth's history, it would've been unable to support human life.

[TurboDally]

"...adding in the REAL temps to HIDE THE DECLINE..."

So the REAL temperatures tell us there is NO decline? Am I the only person who noticed this part of the quote? :S

[m1aws]

@RedXlV Oh right! Is this the "AGW will make animals small" theory recently postulated?

Last I heard those conditions made creatures up to 70' tall.

1C in 100 years? It's been one of the most stable in the memory of man!!!!!

[RedXlV]

@m1aws

For far more than 2/3 of Earth's existence, the climate would not have allowed human beings to survive. And the current warming is not part of a natural cycle. And about the "global cooling" lie:

watch?v=w5D7P2qbKCs

[m1aws]

@RedXlV You are in denial. Go onto the "woodfortrees" website and check out this last decade.. It's irrefutable. I believe in global warming (and cooling). Its perfectly natural.

2/3's of the Earths existence saw 2000ppm CO2. It's been dropping for 70M years. We have returned a tiny part of this carbon cycle. 2010 was actually a tie, a weather glitch that 2011 made up for. Deniers use weather glitches lol.

Merry Xmas x

[RedXlV]

@m1aws

All of those claims are false, naturally. But since you're a global warming denier, you don't care about facts. You'll just repeat the lie and hope that makes people believe it.

In the real world, the last decade has been the hottest on record. The hottest year on record so far is 2010. Yet somehow you expect people to buy your nonsense about global cooling?

[m1aws]

@RedXlV The past decade has seen global cooling. The sea's are now dropping and the Arctic has no further statistical losses of ice.

They don't refute that now so they are scrambling to look for mitigations that show a computer modelled rise underlying the drop in the real world.

[Dodger481]

@RedXlV

Jones was asked on BBC if there was any statistically signifigant warming. He said NO! Not that it matters as anyone can download the data and plot it in a spreadsheet themselves to see. The fact of the matter is that more c02 does not neccesarily mean higher average temperatures. Clearly the many other factors that make up cliamte dwarf the relevance of C02. On this there is no disagreement. Global warming related to co2 emissions is just not that important. Watch the Video!